• Galan-Lopez, J.
• Sedighiani, Karo
• Ochoa Avendaño, Jhon
• Kestens, Leo A. I.
• Bos, C.

Abstract

<p>In an industrial context, selecting an appropriate crystal plasticity (CP) model that balances efficiency and accuracy when modelling deformation texture (DT) is crucial. This study compared DTs in IF-steel after undergoing cold rolling reductions using different CP models for two input texture scenarios. Three mean-field (MFCP) models were utilised in their most basic configurations, without considering grain fragmentation or strain hardening, in addition to a dislocation-density-based full-field (FFCP) model. The study quantitatively compared the results from the MFCP models with those from the FFCP models. Furthermore, all CP model results were compared with experimental textures obtained from electron back-scatter diffraction (EBSD) experiments. The findings revealed that certain MFCP models could predict deformation textures as accurately as the FFCP models. Notably, one of the MFCP models exhibited a superior match with experimental textures for cold rolling reductions at 60%. Upon closer examination of specific crystallographic components, it was observed that MFCP models tended to predict a stronger {111}〈211〉 component, while the full-field model favours the {111}〈011〉 component. It is crucial to emphasise the importance of quantifying the texture within individual grains when assessing the macro-level deformation texture in rolling simulations.</p>

Topics

• density
• impedance spectroscopy
• grain
• experiment
• simulation
• steel
• dislocation
• texture
• plasticity
• electron backscatter diffraction
• cold rolling
• crystal plasticity