| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Schuschnigg, Stephan
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (34/34 displayed)
- 2024Simulation of the Melting Region in Additive Manufacturing Material Extrusion Dies for Highly Filled Feedstocks
- 2024Comparative analysis of binder systems in copper feedstocks for metal extrusion additive manufacturing and metal injection mouldingcitations
- 2024Production of Permanent Magnets from Recycled NdFeB Powder with Powder Extrusion Mouldingcitations
- 2024Binder System Composition on the Rheological and Magnetic Properties of Nd-Fe-B Feedstocks for Metal Injection Moldingcitations
- 2024Rapid tooling for rubber extrusion molding by digital light processing 3D printing with dual curable vitrimerscitations
- 2024Additive Manufacturing Material Extrusion @ Institute of Polymer Processing
- 2023Susmagpro
- 2023Debinding And Sintering Strategies For Fused Filament Fabrication Of Aluminium Alloyscitations
- 2023Effects of Different Polypropylene (PP)-Backbones in Aluminium Feedstock for Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF)citations
- 2023Validation Of Alternative Binders for Pellet Extrusion 3D Printing Of 316L Steels
- 2022Research Progress on Low-Pressure Powder Injection Moldingcitations
- 2022In-situ alignment of 3D printed anisotropic hard magnetscitations
- 2021Thermal conductive, electrically insulating polymer compounds using material extrusion additive manufacturing for electronic parts
- 2021Powder content in powder extrusion moulding of tool steelcitations
- 2020Additive Fertigung metallischer und keramischer Bauteile
- 2019Fabrication and properties of extrusion-based 3D-printed hardmetal and cermet componentscitations
- 2019Filament-extrusion 3D printing of hardmetal and cermet parts
- 2018Feedstocks for the Shaping-Debinding-Sintering Process of Multi Material Components
- 2018Adhesion of standard filament materials to different build platforms in material extrusion additive manufacturing
- 2018Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing for Photocatalytic Applications
- 2018Highly-filled Polymers for Fused Filament Fabrication
- 2018Additive Manufacturing of Metallic and Ceramic Components by the Material Extrusion of Highly-Filled Polymerscitations
- 2018Polypropylene Filled With Glass Spheres in Extrusion‐Based Additive Manufacturingcitations
- 2017Effect of the printing bed temperature on the adhesion of parts produced by fused filament fabricationcitations
- 2016Dissipative particle dynamics simulations of orientation of layered silicate particles embedded in polymer melts under shear flowscitations
- 2016Structure of Polypropylene Macromolecules in the Vicinity of Fe2O3 Surface
- 2016Effect of Particle Size on the Properties of Highly-Filled Polymers for Fused Filament Fabrication
- 2016Bonding Forces in Fused Filament Fabrication
- 2016Coupled Orientation and Stretching of Chains in Mesoscale Models of Polydisperse Linear Polymers in Startup of Steady Shear Flow Simulationscitations
- 2016Haftungsvorhersage und Haftungsverbesserung im Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) Prozess
- 2016Special Materials and Technologies for Fused Filament Fabrication
- 2016Properties for PIM Feedstocks Used in Fused Filament Fabrication
- 2016Optimization of twin screw extrusion using CFD for polymer/nanoclay composites
- 2015Optimization of Twin Screw Extrusion using CFD for Polymer/Nanoclay Composites
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Comparative analysis of binder systems in copper feedstocks for metal extrusion additive manufacturing and metal injection moulding
Abstract
In the realm of material innovation, the remarkable versatility of thermoplastic-based highly filled composites emerges as a pivotal advantage for fabricating metal parts, seamlessly integrating design flexibility. This study delves into the fusion of design and manufacturing, spotlighting the convergence of material extrusion additive manufacturing (MEX) and metal injection moulding (MIM) processes through the adept utilization of three distinct in-house developed copper-feedstocks. Each feedstock had a different composition that influenced their processability; two feedstocks were for solvent and thermal debinding, and one was only for thermal debinding. The sintering was carried out under the same conditions for all produced specimens to assess the effect of binder composition on the properties of the sintered components. Structural integrity evaluations of sintered specimens encompassed 3-point bending, hardness tests, and metallography. It was possible to perform MEX with all produced filaments and MIM with the pellets of the same feedstocks and to obtain acceptable-quality specimens. Regardless of the shaping method, specimens shaped with binders containing a soluble binder survived the thermal and sintering steps. The specimens produced from the feedstock intended solely for thermal debinding experienced a nearly complete loss of shape during the debinding process. For the specimens that could be debound and sintered without defects, a relative density between ∼88 and 94 % was measured for MEX components and ∼93 and 95 % for MIM components after sintering. All sintered components showed the same diffraction peaks as pure copper powder, confirming that the reductive hydrogen atmosphere provided protection from contamination and reduced the oxides that could have appeared during thermal debinding in air. Moreover, adequate shrinkage of ∼10–18 % was observed in the sintered specimens. Vickers microhardness of the MEX and MIM sintered components were ∼32 HV and ∼36 HV, respectively. Compared to MEX, MIM-produced sintered components showed a higher maximum stress (i.e., σmax = 79 ± 3.2 MPa). These results demonstrate that the binder composition plays a crucial role in determining the success of metal MEX and MIM processes. Having the possibility to choose between MEX and MIM allows for greater design flexibility for copper parts.