Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Fleck, Norman A.

  • Google
  • 15
  • 34
  • 207

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (15/15 displayed)

  • 2020Growth rate of lithium filaments in ceramic electrolytescitations
  • 2020Dendrites as climbing dislocations in ceramic electrolytes: Initiation of growthcitations
  • 2020The crack growth resistance of an elastoplastic latticecitations
  • 2020An assessment of the J-integral test for a metallic foam13citations
  • 2019The role of plastic strain gradients in the crack growth resistance of metals78citations
  • 2019Tensile fracture of an adhesive joint19citations
  • 2019The mechanics of solid-state nanofoaming7citations
  • 2019Creep failure of honeycombs made by rapid prototyping10citations
  • 2019The mechanics of solid-state nanofoaming.citations
  • 2019Mechanical Properties of PMMA-Sepiolite Nanocellular Materials with a Bimodal Cellular Structure24citations
  • 2018Compressive Behavior and Failure Mechanisms of Freestanding and Composite 3D Graphitic Foams11citations
  • 2017Linking Scales in Plastic Deformation and Fracturecitations
  • 2016The tensile ductility of cellular solids: the role of imperfections45citations
  • 2015Hierarchical macroscopic fibrillar adhesives: in situ study of buckling and adhesion mechanisms on wavy substratescitations
  • 2003Near net shape fabrication of highly porous parts by powder metallurgycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Shishvan, Ss
2 / 5 shared
Deshpande, Vs
5 / 32 shared
Mcmeeking, Robert M.
2 / 9 shared
Tankasala, Harika C.
1 / 1 shared
Tankasala, Hc
2 / 3 shared
Li, T.
1 / 24 shared
Seiler, Philipp E.
2 / 2 shared
Niordson, Christian Frithiof
2 / 52 shared
Martínez-Pañeda, Emilio
1 / 15 shared
Van Loock, Frederik
4 / 15 shared
Thouless, M. D.
1 / 3 shared
Perez, Miguel Angel Rodriguez
1 / 1 shared
Bernardo, Victoria
3 / 3 shared
Rodríguez Pérez, Miguel Angel
1 / 1 shared
Leon, Judith Martin-De
1 / 1 shared
Rodriguez-Perez, Miguel Angel
1 / 2 shared
Nakanishi, Kenichi
1 / 5 shared
Berwind, Matthew
1 / 1 shared
Eberl, Christoph
1 / 6 shared
Aria, Adrianus I.
1 / 2 shared
Hofmann, Stephan
1 / 46 shared
Weatherup, Rs
1 / 28 shared
Vikram, S. Deshpande
1 / 1 shared
Martinez-Paneda, Emilio
1 / 3 shared
Ronan, William
1 / 2 shared
Kroner, Elmar
1 / 7 shared
Bauer, Christina T.
1 / 2 shared
Arzt, Eduard
1 / 28 shared
Stöver, Detlev
1 / 29 shared
Banhart, John
1 / 11 shared
Buchkremer, Hans Peter
1 / 14 shared
Laptev, Alexander
1 / 7 shared
Bram, Martin
1 / 17 shared
Mortensen, Andreas
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2003

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Shishvan, Ss
  • Deshpande, Vs
  • Mcmeeking, Robert M.
  • Tankasala, Harika C.
  • Tankasala, Hc
  • Li, T.
  • Seiler, Philipp E.
  • Niordson, Christian Frithiof
  • Martínez-Pañeda, Emilio
  • Van Loock, Frederik
  • Thouless, M. D.
  • Perez, Miguel Angel Rodriguez
  • Bernardo, Victoria
  • Rodríguez Pérez, Miguel Angel
  • Leon, Judith Martin-De
  • Rodriguez-Perez, Miguel Angel
  • Nakanishi, Kenichi
  • Berwind, Matthew
  • Eberl, Christoph
  • Aria, Adrianus I.
  • Hofmann, Stephan
  • Weatherup, Rs
  • Vikram, S. Deshpande
  • Martinez-Paneda, Emilio
  • Ronan, William
  • Kroner, Elmar
  • Bauer, Christina T.
  • Arzt, Eduard
  • Stöver, Detlev
  • Banhart, John
  • Buchkremer, Hans Peter
  • Laptev, Alexander
  • Bram, Martin
  • Mortensen, Andreas
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Tensile fracture of an adhesive joint

  • Fleck, Norman A.
  • Van Loock, Frederik
  • Thouless, M. D.
Abstract

<p>The tensile strength of an adhesive joint is predicted for a centre-cracked elastic layer, sandwiched between elastic substrates, and subjected to remote tensile stress. A tensile cohesive plastic zone, of Dugdale type, is placed at each crack tip, and the cohesive zone is characterised by a finite strength and a finite toughness. An analytical theory of the fracture strength is developed (and validated by finite element simulations). The macroscopic strength of the adhesive joint is determined as a function of the relative magnitude of crack length, layer thickness, plastic zone size, specimen width and elastic modulus mismatch between layer and substrates. Fracture maps are constructed to reveal competing regimes of behaviour. The maps span the full range of behaviour from a perfectly brittle response (with no crack tip plasticity) to full plastic collapse. When the sum of crack length and cohesive zone length is less than 0.3 times the layer height, the effect of elastic mismatch between substrate and adhesive layer has only a minor influence upon the macroscopic fracture strength. For this case, the cracked adhesive layer behaves as a centre-crack in an infinite solid made from adhesive, and a transition from toughness control to strength control occurs when the crack length is comparable to that of the cohesive zone length. Alternatively, when the sum of crack length and cohesive zone length exceeds 0.3 times the layer height, the elastic mismatch plays a major role; again there is a transition from toughness control to strength control, but it occurs at a ratio of crack length to layer thickness that depends upon both the elastic mismatch and the ratio of cohesive zone length to layer height. The study also highlights the importance of a structural length scale in the form of layer height times modulus mismatch: this scale is on the order of 1 metre when the layer height equals one millimetre and the elastic modulus of the substrate is one thousand times that of the adhesive layer. The in-plane structural dimensions (including crack length) must exceed this structural dimension in order for a remote K-field to exist within the substrate. Experimental validation of the cohesive zone approach is achieved by measuring the sensitivity of fracture strength to crack length and layer height for a centre-cracked strip made from cellulose acetate layer, sandwiched between aluminium alloy substrates.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • theory
  • simulation
  • aluminium
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • aluminium alloy
  • plasticity
  • tensile strength
  • cellulose