Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Lani, E.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 20

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019On a unique fracture micromechanism for highly cross-linked epoxy resins20citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Morelle, Xp
1 / 2 shared
Camanho, Pp
1 / 229 shared
Pardoen, T.
1 / 30 shared
Chevalier, J.
1 / 22 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Morelle, Xp
  • Camanho, Pp
  • Pardoen, T.
  • Chevalier, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

On a unique fracture micromechanism for highly cross-linked epoxy resins

  • Morelle, Xp
  • Camanho, Pp
  • Pardoen, T.
  • Lani, E.
  • Chevalier, J.
Abstract

Micromechanics-based fracture criteria for highly cross-linked thermosets are heavily needed in the context of multiscale composite failure analysis. Fracture in an epoxy resin under quasi-static loadings was previously addressed using a two-parameter model, formulated in terms of the attainment of a critical tensile stress at the tip of internal defects. This model requires the identification of the aspect ratio of the defect and of the critical stress. Here, we unravel the physics underlying this fracture criterion and extend its validity to high temperature test conditions, to fatigue and to fracture toughness in an application to the RTM6 epoxy resin system. Accurate prediction of the fracture strain at high temperatures supports the stress-based nature of the criterion. Fractographic analyses justify the relevance of the attainment of a critical stress in fatigue as well. Indeed, the similitude between fracture surfaces under quasi-static and fatigue loading conditions indicates an identical failure scenario which is found to consist of crack nucleation near a defect, a crack arrest step and a re-initiation process including crack tip blunting. Finally, a combination of finite element analyses and experiments allows linking the fracture in pre-cracked specimens to the identified fracture criterion. The success of this approach encompassing such a wide range of conditions was unexpected and leads to a much simpler treatment of fracture in this class of thermoset materials compared to other existing approaches. It opens new avenues for improving failure analysis of composites based on highly cross-linked epoxy resins for conditions where matrix cracking is dominant.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • crack
  • fatigue
  • composite
  • resin
  • thermoset
  • fracture toughness