People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Zadpoor, Amir, A.
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (38/38 displayed)
- 2024Curvature tuning through defect-based 4D printingcitations
- 2024On-Demand Magnetically-Activated Drug Delivery from Additively Manufactured Porous Bone Implants to Tackle Antibiotic-Resistant Infectionscitations
- 2024Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of extrusion-based additively manufactured porous iron–manganese scaffoldscitations
- 2024Bone cell response to additively manufactured 3D micro-architectures with controlled Poisson's ratiocitations
- 20244D Printing for Biomedical Applicationscitations
- 2023Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflowcitations
- 2023Auxeticity as a Mechanobiological Tool to Create Meta-Biomaterialscitations
- 2023Extrusion-based 3D printing of biodegradable, osteogenic, paramagnetic, and porous FeMn-akermanite bone substitutescitations
- 2023Quality of AM implants in biomedical applicationcitations
- 2022Mechanisms of fatigue crack initiation and propagation in auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of Mg-Zn alloy scaffoldscitations
- 2022Merging strut-based and minimal surface meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2022Nonlinear coarse-graining models for 3D printed multi-material biomimetic compositescitations
- 2022Additive manufacturing of bioactive and biodegradable porous iron-akermanite composites for bone regenerationcitations
- 2022Poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) coating of additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2022Additive Manufacturing of Biomaterialscitations
- 2021Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterialscitations
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printing of ex situ-alloyed highly biodegradable MRI-friendly porous iron-manganese scaffoldscitations
- 20214D printing of reconfigurable metamaterials and devices
- 2021Dynamic characterization of 3D printed mechanical metamaterials with tunable elastic propertiescitations
- 2021Extrusion-based 3D printed biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2021Biocompatibility and Absorption Behavior in Vitro of Direct Printed Porous Iron Porous Implants
- 2021Mechanical characterization of nanopillars by atomic force microscopycitations
- 2021Lattice structures made by laser powder bed fusioncitations
- 2020Additively manufactured biodegradable porous zinccitations
- 2020Multi-material additive manufacturing technologies for Ti-, Mg-, and Fe-based biomaterials for bone substitutioncitations
- 2020Mechanics of bioinspired functionally graded soft-hard composites made by multi-material 3D printingcitations
- 2019Auxeticity and stiffness of random networkscitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of Ti–6Al–4V parts through laser metal deposition (LMD)citations
- 2019Additively manufactured functionally graded biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2019Additive manufacturing of metals using powder bed-based technologies
- 2019Fracture Behavior of Bio-Inspired Functionally Graded Soft–Hard Composites Made by Multi-Material 3D Printingcitations
- 2019A review of the fatigue behavior of 3D printed polymerscitations
- 2019Biodegradation-affected fatigue behavior of additively manufactured porous magnesiumcitations
- 2018Multi-material 3D printed mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2018Additively manufactured biodegradable porous ironcitations
- 2017Rational design of soft mechanical metamaterialscitations
- 2017Additively manufactured biodegradable porous magnesiumcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Biomechanical evaluation of additively manufactured patient-specific mandibular cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflow
Abstract
<p>Objective: Mandibular reconstruction using patient-specific cage implants is a promising alternative to the vascularized free flap reconstruction for nonirradiated patients with adequate soft tissues, or for patients whose clinical condition is not conducive to microsurgical reconstruction. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical performance of 3D printed patient-specific cage implants designed with a semi-automated workflow in a combined cadaveric and retrospective case series study. Methods: We designed cage implants for two human cadaveric mandibles using our previously developed design workflow. The biomechanical performance of the implants was assessed with the finite element analysis (FEA) and quasi-static biomechanical testing. Digital image correlation (DIC) was used to measure the full-field strains and validate the FE models by comparing the distribution of maximum principal strains within the bone. The retrospective study of a case series involved three patients, each of whom was treated with a cage implant of similar design. The biomechanical performance of these implants was evaluated using the experimentally validated FEA under the scenarios of both mandibular union and nonunion. Results: No implant or screw failure was observed prior to contralateral bone fracture during the quasi-static testing of both cadaveric mandibles. The FEA and DIC strain contour plots indicated a strong linear correlation (r = 0.92) and a low standard error (SE=29.32με), with computational models yielding higher strain values by a factor of 2.7. The overall stresses acting on the case series’ implants stayed well below the yield strength of additively manufactured (AM) commercially pure titanium, when simulated under highly strenuous chewing conditions. Simulating a full union between the graft and remnant mandible yielded a substantial reduction (72.7±1.5%) in local peak stresses within the implants as compared to a non-bonded graft. Conclusions: This study shows the suitability of the developed semi-automated workflow in designing patient-specific cage implants with satisfactory mechanical functioning under demanding chewing conditions. The proposed workflow can aid clinical engineers in creating reconstruction systems and streamlining pre-surgical planning. Nevertheless, more research is still needed to evaluate the osteogenic potential of bone graft insertions.</p>