Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Witkowski, S.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2022Zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated by 3D gel deposition show higher fracture strength than conventionally milled counterparts.13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kohal, Ralf
1 / 4 shared
Nold, Julian
1 / 2 shared
Abram, Anže
1 / 4 shared
Rabel, Kerstin
1 / 6 shared
Kocjan, A.
1 / 2 shared
Pehlke, D.
1 / 1 shared
Shen, J.
1 / 14 shared
Chart of publication period
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kohal, Ralf
  • Nold, Julian
  • Abram, Anže
  • Rabel, Kerstin
  • Kocjan, A.
  • Pehlke, D.
  • Shen, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Zirconia fixed dental prostheses fabricated by 3D gel deposition show higher fracture strength than conventionally milled counterparts.

  • Witkowski, S.
  • Kohal, Ralf
  • Nold, Julian
  • Abram, Anže
  • Rabel, Kerstin
  • Kocjan, A.
  • Pehlke, D.
  • Shen, J.
Abstract

Zirconia restorations, which are fabricated by additive 3D gel deposition and do not require glazing like conventional restorations, were introduced as "self-glazed" zirconia restorations into dentistry. This in vitro investigation characterized the surface layer, microstructure and the fracture and aging behavior of "self-glazed" zirconia (Y-TZP<sub>SG</sub>) three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDP) and compared them to conventionally CAD/CAM milled and glazed controls (Y-TZP<sub>C</sub>-FDPs). For this purpose, the FDPs were analyzed by (focused ion beam) scanning electron microscopy, laserscanning microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction and a dynamic and static loading test. For the latter, half of the samples of each material group (n = 16) was subjected to 5 million cycles of thermocyclic loading (98N) in an aqueous environment in a chewing simulator. Afterwards, all FDPs were loaded to fracture. Y-TZP<sub>SG</sub>-FDPs demonstrated a comparable elemental composition but higher surface microstructural homogeneity and fracture strength compared to Y-TZP<sub>C</sub>-FDPs. Microstructural flaws within the FDPs' surfaces were identified as fracture origins. The high fracture strength of the Y-TZP<sub>SG</sub>-FDPs was attributed to a finer-grained microstructure with fewer surface flaws compared to the Y-TZP<sub>C</sub>-FDPs which showed numerous flaws in the glaze overlayer. A decrease in fracture strength after dynamic loading from 5165N to 4507N was observed for the Y-TZP<sub>SG</sub>-FDPs, however, fracture strength remained statistically significantly above the one measured for Y-TZP<sub>C</sub>-FDPs (before chewing simulation: 1923N; after: 2041N). Within the limits of this investigation, it can therefore be concluded that Y-TZP<sub>SG</sub> appears to be stable for clinical application suggesting further investigations to prove clinical applicability.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • microstructure
  • surface
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • x-ray diffraction
  • simulation
  • strength
  • focused ion beam
  • aging
  • aging
  • X-ray spectroscopy
  • collision-induced dissociation