Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Jager, N. De

  • Google
  • 9
  • 25
  • 326

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2020Effect of different materials and undercut on the removal force and stress distribution in circumferential clasps during direct retainer action in removable partial dentures61citations
  • 2020Fatigue performance of distinct CAD/CAM dental ceramics40citations
  • 2020Young’s modulus and poisson ratio of composite materials10citations
  • 2018Does luting strategy affect the fatigue behavior of bonded Y-TZP ceramic?14citations
  • 2017Adhesive cementation promotes higher fatigue resistance to zirconia crowns63citations
  • 2015Mechanical performance of implant-supported posterior crowns111citations
  • 2012The influence of pigments on the slow crack growth in dental zirconia9citations
  • 2010The influence of rotating fatigue on the bond strength of zirconia-composite interfaces18citations
  • 2008Influence of retainer design on two-unit cantilever resin-bonded glass fiber reinforced composite fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro and finite element analysis studycitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Araújo, R. M.
1 / 1 shared
Jpm, Tribst
1 / 88 shared
Borges, A. L. S.
1 / 6 shared
Bottino, M. A.
2 / 25 shared
Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
9 / 105 shared
Dal Piva, Amanda
1 / 41 shared
Silva, J. M. F. Da
1 / 1 shared
Guilardi, L. F.
1 / 5 shared
Valandro, L. F.
3 / 24 shared
Werner, A.
1 / 13 shared
Rippe, M. P.
1 / 9 shared
Soares, P.
1 / 10 shared
Pereira, G. K. R.
1 / 13 shared
Dutra, D. A. Milbrandt
1 / 1 shared
Lourenço, A. L.
1 / 2 shared
Prochnow, C.
1 / 6 shared
Fraga, S.
1 / 10 shared
Campos, F.
2 / 5 shared
Feilzer, A. J.
5 / 39 shared
Feitosa, S. A.
1 / 2 shared
Kok, P. De
1 / 2 shared
Kuijs, R.
1 / 2 shared
Aboushelib, M. N.
2 / 11 shared
Mirmohammadi, H.
1 / 6 shared
Keulemans, F.
1 / 6 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2018
2017
2015
2012
2010
2008

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Araújo, R. M.
  • Jpm, Tribst
  • Borges, A. L. S.
  • Bottino, M. A.
  • Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
  • Dal Piva, Amanda
  • Silva, J. M. F. Da
  • Guilardi, L. F.
  • Valandro, L. F.
  • Werner, A.
  • Rippe, M. P.
  • Soares, P.
  • Pereira, G. K. R.
  • Dutra, D. A. Milbrandt
  • Lourenço, A. L.
  • Prochnow, C.
  • Fraga, S.
  • Campos, F.
  • Feilzer, A. J.
  • Feitosa, S. A.
  • Kok, P. De
  • Kuijs, R.
  • Aboushelib, M. N.
  • Mirmohammadi, H.
  • Keulemans, F.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fatigue performance of distinct CAD/CAM dental ceramics

  • Guilardi, L. F.
  • Jager, N. De
  • Valandro, L. F.
  • Werner, A.
  • Kleverlaan, Cornelis Johannes
  • Rippe, M. P.
  • Soares, P.
  • Pereira, G. K. R.
Abstract

<p>This study investigated the effect of surface roughness (polished vs. CAD/CAM milling roughness simulation) on the fatigue behavior of five dental ceramics for manufacturing CAD/CAM monolithic restorations. Specimens of five dental ceramics (FC- feldspathic; PICN- polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network; ZLS- zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass-ceramic; LD-lithium disilicate glass-ceramic; YZ-yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal), to be tested under fatigue (12 × 12 × 1.2 mm<sup>3</sup>), were assigned into two groups according to surface treatment: polished ‘p’ (#2500-grit SiC papers) and CAD/CAM milling roughness simulation ‘gr’ (grinding with #60-grit SiC paper). The fatigue test was performed through the stepwise method (40N–660N; step of 20N; 10,000 cycles/step; 20 Hz frequency). Roughness, topographic and fractographic analyses were performed. The fatigue data were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and Mantel-Cox (Log rank), and Pearson correlation was used to correlate roughness vs. fatigue data. CAD/CAM milling roughness simulation led to significantly (p &lt; 0.05) greater roughness (Ra and Rz), promoting a more irregular topography with scratches and grooves, and led to a lower fatigue performance for all the tested ceramics. Fractographic analysis depicted the origin of failure at the higher stress concentration side, the side subjected to tensile tension during the fatigue test. The CAD/CAM milling roughness simulation significantly decreased the fatigue performance of the evaluated ceramic materials.</p>

Topics
  • surface
  • polymer
  • simulation
  • grinding
  • glass
  • glass
  • milling
  • fatigue
  • Lithium
  • ceramic
  • collision-induced dissociation