Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Petschelt, Anselm

  • Google
  • 3
  • 8
  • 444

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2018Fracture anisotropy in texturized lithium disilicate glass-ceramics40citations
  • 2018Fracture toughness testing of biomedical ceramic-based materials using beams, plates and discs56citations
  • 2017Chairside CAD/CAM materials. Part 1: Measurement of elastic constants and microstructural characterization348citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
De Ligny, Dominique
2 / 137 shared
Belli, Renan
3 / 4 shared
Werbach, Katharina
1 / 4 shared
Cicconi, Maria Rita
2 / 24 shared
Lohbauer, Ulrich
3 / 6 shared
Wendler, Michael
3 / 3 shared
Peterlik, Herwig
2 / 8 shared
Lube, Tanja
1 / 8 shared
Chart of publication period
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • De Ligny, Dominique
  • Belli, Renan
  • Werbach, Katharina
  • Cicconi, Maria Rita
  • Lohbauer, Ulrich
  • Wendler, Michael
  • Peterlik, Herwig
  • Lube, Tanja
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Fracture toughness testing of biomedical ceramic-based materials using beams, plates and discs

  • Lube, Tanja
  • Belli, Renan
  • Lohbauer, Ulrich
  • Petschelt, Anselm
  • Wendler, Michael
Abstract

<p>The testing of fracture toughness becomes problematic when only limited amount of material is available that hinders the production of typical beam specimens to be tested in bending. Here we explore fracture toughness testing methodologies that allow for small discs and plates having surface cracks to be tested in biaxial flexure using the Ball-on-3-balls (B3B) set-up, or sawed notches as in the Compact Tension geometry. The B3B-K<sub>Ic</sub> test has shown to be versatile and account for a very small overestimation of the K<sub>Ic</sub>-value in the order of 0.8–1.25% due to in-plane crack mispositioning, and a maximum of 4% if a worst-case scenario of additional out-of-plane mispositioning is assumed. The geometrical factor in the standard SCF method, derived by Newman and Raju, resulted in an overestimation of ∼8% of the K<sub>Ic</sub>-value compared to the new calculation by Strobl et al. for materials with Poisson's ratio &lt;0.3.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • crack
  • ceramic
  • fracture toughness
  • ion chromatography
  • Poisson's ratio