Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rezaei-Gomari, Sina

  • Google
  • 2
  • 7
  • 29

Teesside University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Exploring the potential of steel slag waste for carbon sequestration through mineral carbonation22citations
  • 2024Feasibility study of biodegradable coffee ground waste and watermelon rind as water-based drilling fluid additives7citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Gomari, Kamal Elyasi
1 / 1 shared
Ahmed, Tariq Galadanchi
1 / 1 shared
Hughes, David
1 / 16 shared
Chong, Perk Lin
1 / 1 shared
Abdalqadir, Mardin
1 / 2 shared
Madu, Chukwuemeka
1 / 1 shared
Faraji, Foad
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Gomari, Kamal Elyasi
  • Ahmed, Tariq Galadanchi
  • Hughes, David
  • Chong, Perk Lin
  • Abdalqadir, Mardin
  • Madu, Chukwuemeka
  • Faraji, Foad
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Exploring the potential of steel slag waste for carbon sequestration through mineral carbonation

  • Gomari, Kamal Elyasi
  • Ahmed, Tariq Galadanchi
  • Rezaei-Gomari, Sina
  • Hughes, David
Abstract

Steel slag is a by-product of steelmaking which has emerged as a potential CO2 sequestration material due to its high reactivity and abundance. This research investigates the use of steel slag waste for the direct capture of carbon from air and its storage through mineral carbonation. Two abundant wastes, blast-furnace slag (BFS) and ladle slag (LS), were tested for their carbon sequestration potential, and the effects of operational parameters such as reaction time between CO2 and slag waste, temperature, liquid-solid ratio, and pressure on CO2 sequestration were determined.<br/><br/>Quantitative and qualitative results reveal that much higher CO2 sequestration was achieved using LS compared to BFS after exposure to CO2 for 1 day at room temperature. By increasing the exposure time to four days, levels of CO2 sequestration increased gradually from 2.71% to 4.19% and 23.46%–28.21% for BFS and LS respectively. Increasing the temperature from 20 ± 2 °C to 90 ± 2 °C positively influenced CO2 sequestration in BFS, resulting in an enhancement from 3.45% to 13.21%. However, the impact on LS was insignificant, with sequestration levels rising from 27.72% to 29.90%. Moreover, better CO2 sequestration was observed for BFS than LS when the liquid-to-solid ratio increased from 3:1 to 4:1, whereupon the sequestration potential reached approximately 15% for BFS and 30% for LS at 90 ± 2 °C. Meanwhile, higher pressure reduced the sequestration potential of slag. The results of this study suggest that there is potential for scaling up the process to industrial applications and contributing to the reduction of CO2 emissions in the steelmaking industry.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mineral
  • Carbon
  • steel
  • laser sintering