Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Van Hulle, Stijn

  • Google
  • 6
  • 27
  • 66

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Process modeling and optimization of photocatalytic treatment of dye-polluted effluent using novel polyaniline/graphene oxide-Fe3O4-Ag nanocomposites2citations
  • 2024Development of photocatalytic semiconductors and nanocomposites with excellent optoelectronic and electrochemical properties for dye effluent remediation : a review4citations
  • 2023Electrocoagulation flotation as a municipal wastewater (pre-)treatment technology : effect of weather conditions and current density11citations
  • 2022Iron oxide coated sand (IOS) : scale-up analysis and full-scale application for phosphorus removal from goat farm wastewater17citations
  • 2021Roof runoff contamination : establishing material-pollutant relationships and material benchmarking based on laboratory leaching tests15citations
  • 2018Techno-economic assessment of surrogate-based real-time control and monitoring of secondary effluent ozonation at pilot scale17citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hilonga, Askwar
2 / 2 shared
Hammond, Vanessa N. K.
1 / 1 shared
Oyetade, Joshua
2 / 2 shared
Boateng, Angela
1 / 1 shared
Machunda, Revocatus Lazaro
2 / 3 shared
Parmentier, Dries
1 / 1 shared
Lezy, Jente
1 / 1 shared
Hassan, Nazia
1 / 2 shared
Le, Quan
1 / 1 shared
Rousseau, Diederik
2 / 2 shared
Yang, Xuetong
1 / 1 shared
Wang, Lutian
1 / 1 shared
Lakho, Fida Hussain
1 / 1 shared
Depuydt, Veerle
1 / 1 shared
Igodt, Wouter
1 / 1 shared
Dumoulin, Ann
1 / 2 shared
Buyck, Pieter-Jan De
1 / 1 shared
Matviichuk, Olha
1 / 1 shared
Nopens, Ingmar
1 / 2 shared
Van Langenhove, Herman
1 / 1 shared
Demeestere, Kristof
1 / 4 shared
Weemaes, Marjoleine
1 / 1 shared
Wieland, Arne
1 / 1 shared
Ried, Achim
1 / 1 shared
Stapel, Harald
1 / 1 shared
Chys, Michael
1 / 1 shared
Audenaert, Wim
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hilonga, Askwar
  • Hammond, Vanessa N. K.
  • Oyetade, Joshua
  • Boateng, Angela
  • Machunda, Revocatus Lazaro
  • Parmentier, Dries
  • Lezy, Jente
  • Hassan, Nazia
  • Le, Quan
  • Rousseau, Diederik
  • Yang, Xuetong
  • Wang, Lutian
  • Lakho, Fida Hussain
  • Depuydt, Veerle
  • Igodt, Wouter
  • Dumoulin, Ann
  • Buyck, Pieter-Jan De
  • Matviichuk, Olha
  • Nopens, Ingmar
  • Van Langenhove, Herman
  • Demeestere, Kristof
  • Weemaes, Marjoleine
  • Wieland, Arne
  • Ried, Achim
  • Stapel, Harald
  • Chys, Michael
  • Audenaert, Wim
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Electrocoagulation flotation as a municipal wastewater (pre-)treatment technology : effect of weather conditions and current density

  • Parmentier, Dries
  • Lezy, Jente
  • Hassan, Nazia
  • Van Hulle, Stijn
Abstract

Electrocoagulation (EC) is a promising compact alternative technology, despite its viability in municipal wastewater treatment (MWWT) is currently challenged by its energy-intensive and batch-mode operation. This study introduces an innovative continuous electrocoagulation flotation (ECF) design for MWWT. ECF shows promising pollutant removal efficiencies, with identical results using both iron (Fe) and aluminum (Al) anodes. At a current density (CD) of 120 A/m2, it achieved significant removals: 90% tCOD, 98% TP, 94% TSS, 60% BOD5, and 40% TN. Designed ECF is proposed as a pre-treatment step due to limited TN removal. The study investigated optimal ECF performance under varying weather conditions using CD ranges of 40, 80, and 120 A/m2. Both Fe and Al ECF outperformed in treating rainy weather (RW) and dry weather (DW) municipal wastewater (MWW). However, Al anode's super-faradaic behavior resulted in higher residual concentrations in effluent, (i.e., an average of 6.53–33.7 mg/L), and operational costs compared to Fe ECF. Optimized Fe ECF setting needs to be changed depending in the weather variation. Fe ECF achieved high removal rates for tCOD (94%) and TP (95%) in RW MWW at a low CD of 40 A/m2. Comparative to this, the optimum CD for treated DW MWW was between 40 and 80 A/m2, removing tCOD (71–73%) and TP (85–95%). Specifically, at these conditions, the operational expenses were respectively 0.47 ± 0.03 €/m3 (RW MWW), and 0.37 ± 0.02 €/m3 to 0.81 ± 0.04 €/m3 (DW MWW). Moreover, ECF enables resource recovery and a circular economy through anaerobic sludge digestion, with Fe ECF generating more biogas than Al.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • aluminium
  • iron
  • current density