Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Regufe, Mj

  • Google
  • 2
  • 6
  • 63

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Study of methane upgrading using an activated carbon 3D-printed adsorbent5citations
  • 2018New hybrid composite honeycomb monolith with 13X zeolite and activated carbon for CO2 capture58citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ferreira, Afp
2 / 6 shared
Ribeiro, Am
2 / 3 shared
Rodrigues, A.
2 / 7 shared
Pereira, A.
1 / 11 shared
Loureiro, Jm
1 / 2 shared
Shi, Yx
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ferreira, Afp
  • Ribeiro, Am
  • Rodrigues, A.
  • Pereira, A.
  • Loureiro, Jm
  • Shi, Yx
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Study of methane upgrading using an activated carbon 3D-printed adsorbent

  • Ferreira, Afp
  • Regufe, Mj
  • Ribeiro, Am
  • Rodrigues, A.
  • Pereira, A.
Abstract

Although Maxsorb is a commercially available powder-form material, to be used in adsorption-based processes, its handling is easier if used with a structured geometry. Indeed, in the monolithic form, activated carbons have shown the potential to be used in adsorption-based applications. The use of additive manufacturing (AM) allows the development of structured adsorbents with adaptable geometries. In this work, Maxsorb activated carbon was 3D-printed into a monolithic structure using a polymeric binding agent, carboxymethylcellulose (CMC). The monolith was obtained through direct writing of filaments of an ink containing the adsorbent and the binding agent in a layered way, according to a pre-established pattern. The material was comprehensively characterized by N2 physisorption at 77 K and CO2 adsorption at 273 K to analyze the porous structure, SEM, and mercury porosimetry to evaluate the macrostructure porosity. To examine the affinity of CH4 and N2 with the adsorbent, pure adsorption equilibrium isotherms of these two gases on the 3D-printed monolith were measured at 303, 333, and 373 K by a gravimetric method. The adsorption capacities were compared to the ones of the original powder. The activated carbon materials showed a higher affinity to CH4. Furthermore, the adsorption equilibrium data of CO2 and Ar were also assessed. For all gases, the adsorption capacities decreased upon shaping. The monolith's CH4/N2 ideal selectivity was compared with its pristine powder (2.84 vs. 3.54). The CH4/N2 separation performance was also assessed through dynamic breakthrough tests. The experimental breakthrough curves were well predicted using a mathematical model.

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • layered
  • porosity
  • additive manufacturing
  • porosimetry
  • Mercury