Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Cune, Marco S.

  • Google
  • 9
  • 22
  • 87

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2024Biomechanical behavior of molars restored with direct and indirect restorations in combination with deep margin elevation.6citations
  • 2024Partial glass-ceramic posterior restorations with margins beyond or above the cemento-enamel junction3citations
  • 2023De coronaalwaarts verplaatste preparatiegrens voor adhesieve indirecte restauraties2citations
  • 2023Deep margin elevationcitations
  • 2020Breuksterkte van verschillende types directe en indirecte restauraties bij het functioneel herstel van endodontisch behandelde molarencitations
  • 2020Influence of Deep Margin Elevation and preparation design on the fracture strength of indirectly restored molars35citations
  • 2019Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function35citations
  • 2017Surface degradation of nanocrystalline zirconia dental implants1citations
  • 2017On the bulk degradation of yttria-stabilized nanocrystalline zirconia dental implant abutments5citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Bresser, Rijkje
5 / 6 shared
Gresnigt, Marco
7 / 7 shared
Naves, Lucas Zago
3 / 16 shared
Carvalho, Marco Aurelio De
1 / 1 shared
Melma, H.
1 / 1 shared
Hofsteenge, Jelte W.
1 / 1 shared
Buijs, Gerrit J.
1 / 1 shared
Van Den Breemer, Carline
2 / 2 shared
Özcan, Mutlu
1 / 75 shared
Made, Stephan A. M. Van Der
1 / 1 shared
Houten, M. Van Den
1 / 1 shared
Schepke, Ulf
4 / 5 shared
Haumahu, D.
1 / 1 shared
De Kuijper, Maurits
1 / 1 shared
Geer, L. Van De
1 / 1 shared
Gerdolle, D.
1 / 1 shared
Kerdijk, W.
1 / 1 shared
Özcan, M.
1 / 16 shared
Ocelík, Václav
2 / 127 shared
Hosson, Jeff Th. M. De
2 / 119 shared
Rasoul, Hamid Haji
1 / 1 shared
Rasoul, H. Haji
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2020
2019
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Bresser, Rijkje
  • Gresnigt, Marco
  • Naves, Lucas Zago
  • Carvalho, Marco Aurelio De
  • Melma, H.
  • Hofsteenge, Jelte W.
  • Buijs, Gerrit J.
  • Van Den Breemer, Carline
  • Özcan, Mutlu
  • Made, Stephan A. M. Van Der
  • Houten, M. Van Den
  • Schepke, Ulf
  • Haumahu, D.
  • De Kuijper, Maurits
  • Geer, L. Van De
  • Gerdolle, D.
  • Kerdijk, W.
  • Özcan, M.
  • Ocelík, Václav
  • Hosson, Jeff Th. M. De
  • Rasoul, Hamid Haji
  • Rasoul, H. Haji
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Randomized clinical trial on the survival of lithium disilicate posterior partial restorations bonded using immediate or delayed dentin sealing after 3 years of function

  • Kerdijk, W.
  • Özcan, M.
  • Van Den Breemer, Carline
  • Gresnigt, Marco
  • Naves, Lucas Zago
  • Cune, Marco S.
Abstract

<p>Objectives: The survival and success rate and the quality of survival of partial ceramic restorations bonded employing Immediate (IDS) or Delayed Dentin Sealing (DDS) in vital molar teeth were evaluated in a randomized clinical trial with within-subject comparison study.</p><p>Materials and methods: 30 patients received two lithium disilicate ceramic (IPS-e.max press, Ivoclar Vivadent) partial restorations on vital first or second molar teeth (N = 60). The two teeth randomly received either IDS (test group, n = 30) or DDS (control group, n = 30). Partial ceramic restorations were luted (Variolink Ultra, Ivoclar Vivadent) two weeks after preparation. Evaluations were performed at 1 week, 12 months and 36 months post-operatively, using qualitative (FDI) criteria. Representative failures were evaluated microscopically (SEM) and by means of simplified qualitative fractography analysis.</p><p>Results: One absolute failure occurred in the DDS group due to (secondary) caries. The overall survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier after 3 years was 98.3% (FDI criteria score 1-4, n = 59) and the overall success rate was 85% (FDI criteria score 1-3, n = 51), with no significant difference between restorations in the IDS and DDS group (p = 0.32; Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank (Mantel-Cox), CI = 95%). For the quality of the survival, no statistically significant differences were found between IDS and DDS (p = 0.7; Kaplan-Meier, Log Rank (Mantel-Cox), CI = 95%) restorations on any follow-up timepoints for any of the FDI criteria (Wilcoxon, McNemar, p &gt; 0.05).</p><p>Conclusion: Adhesively luted partial ceramic restorations in vital molar teeth have a good prognosis, however IDS did not show any differences in success and survival rates after 3 years of function.</p>

Topics
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • Lithium
  • ceramic
  • fractography
  • chemical ionisation