People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Banerjee, Avijit
King's College London
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (21/21 displayed)
- 2023Release Kinetics of Monomers from Dental Composites Containing Fluoride-Doped Calcium Phosphatescitations
- 2021Commercially available ion-releasing dental materials and cavitated carious lesionscitations
- 2021Conventional Glass-ionomer Cements: A Guide for Practitionerscitations
- 2020An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cementscitations
- 2020Chemo-Mechanical Characterisation of Carious Dentine Using Raman Microscopy and Knoop Microhardness.
- 2020Chemo-mechanical characterization of carious dentine using Raman microscopy and Knoop microhardnesscitations
- 2019In vitro compressive strength and edge stability testing of directly repaired glass-ionomer cementscitations
- 2018In-vitro subsurface remineralisation of artificial enamel white spot lesions pre-treated with chitosan
- 2018Remineralisation of enamel white spot lesions pre-treated with chitosan in the presence of salivary pelliclecitations
- 2018In vitro remineralization of caries-affected dentin after selective carious tissue removalcitations
- 2016The effect of air-abrasion on the susceptibility of sound enamel to acid challengecitations
- 2015Surface pre-conditioning with bioactive glass air-abrasion can enhance enamel white spot lesion remineralizationcitations
- 2014Enamel white spot lesions can remineralise using bio-active glass and polyacrylic acid-modified bio-active glass powderscitations
- 2013In Vitro Effect of Air-abrasion Operating Parameters on Dynamic Cutting Characteristics of Alumina and Bio-active Glass Powderscitations
- 2012Influence of air-abrasion executed with polyacrylic acid-Bioglass 45S5 on the bonding performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer cementcitations
- 2011An in vitro evaluation of selective demineralised enamel removal using bio-active glass air abrasioncitations
- 2011Minimally invasive caries removal using bio-active glass air-abrasioncitations
- 2010Pulp response to resin-modified glass ionomer and calcium hydroxide cements in deep cavities: A quantitative systematic reviewcitations
- 2009An in vitro evaluation of the efficiency of an air-abrasion system using helium as a propellantcitations
- 2008An in vitro investigation of the effect and retention of bioactive glass air-abrasive on sound and carious dentinecitations
- 2006Microhardness as a predictor of sound and carious dentine removal using alumina air abrasioncitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
An in vitro investigation of the effect and retention of bioactive glass air-abrasive on sound and carious dentine
Abstract
Objectives: To examine the removal rate of sound and carious dentine using bioactive glass air-abrasion and investigate abrasive particle retention of alumina and bioactive glass on abraded dentine. Methods: Crushed bioactive glass was investigated as an alternative air-abrasive to alumina at air pressures of 138, 413 and 689 kPa in the presence or absence of water. The correlation coefficient between the amount of dentine removed using bioactive glass air-abrasion and the Knoop Hardness Number of dentine was calculated. The comparative retention of bioactive glass (BG) and alumina (AL) abrasive on human dentine blocks were calculated as atomic ratios acquired by spectral analysis between air-abrasive tracers (Si for bioactive glass, and Al for alumina) and Ca. A total of 60 dentine blocks were abraded using Al or BG in 12 groups of 5 using three different pressures in using wet and dry air-abrasion. Results: The amount of dentine removed using bioactive glass air-abrasion had a Somers' D coefficient of 0.65 for the Knoop hardness. Wet air-abrasion caused a significant (p 0.05) decrease in the amount of abrasive retained on the surface for Al air-abrasion at 138 and 413 kPa and BG air-abrasion at 413 and 689 kPa. Conclusion: There was a negative correlation between propellant pressure and abrasive retained. Bioglass removed healthy dentine at a higher rate than carious dentine - the difference however, being less than with equivalent alumina air-abrasion, thus making it a potentially more selective instrument for clinical caries excavation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved