Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Hosaka, K.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 7
  • 24

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2007Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentine24citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nakajima, M.
1 / 9 shared
Pashley, D. H.
1 / 4 shared
Aksornmuang, J.
1 / 3 shared
Yamauti, M.
1 / 2 shared
Tagami, J.
1 / 13 shared
Ikeda, M.
1 / 5 shared
Foxton, Richard Mark
1 / 29 shared
Chart of publication period
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nakajima, M.
  • Pashley, D. H.
  • Aksornmuang, J.
  • Yamauti, M.
  • Tagami, J.
  • Ikeda, M.
  • Foxton, Richard Mark
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on all-in-one adhesive bond strengths to dentine

  • Nakajima, M.
  • Pashley, D. H.
  • Aksornmuang, J.
  • Yamauti, M.
  • Tagami, J.
  • Hosaka, K.
  • Ikeda, M.
  • Foxton, Richard Mark
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the durability of all-in-one adhesive systems bonded to dentine with and without simulated hydrostatic pulpal pressure (PP). Methods: Flat dentine surfaces of extracted human molars were prepared. Two all-in-one adhesive systems, One-Up Bond F (OBF) (Tokuyama Corp., Tokyo, Japan), and Fluoro Bond Shake One (FBS) (Shofu Co., Kyoto, Japan) were applied to the dentine surfaces under either a PP of 0 or 15 cm H2O. Then, resin composite build-ups were made. The specimens bonded under pressure were stored in 37 degrees C water for 24 h, 1 and 3 months under 15 cm H2O PP. Specimens not bonded under pressure were stored under zero PP. After storage, the specimens were sectioned into slabs that were trimmed to hourglass shapes and subjected to micro-tensile bond testing (mu TBS). The data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak HSD multiple comparison tests (alpha = 0.05). Results: The mu TBS of OBF fell significantly (p <0.05) when PP was applied during bonding and storage, regardless of storage time. In contrast, although the mu TBS of OBF specimens bonded and stored without hydrostatic pressure storage fell significantly over the 3 months period, the decrease was less than half as much as specimens stored under PP. In FBS bonded specimens, although there was no significant difference between the mu TBS with and without hydrostatic pulpal pressure at 24 h, by 1 and 3 months of storage under PP, significant reductions were seen compared with the control group without PP. Conclusion: The mu TBS of OBF bonded specimens was lowered more by simulated PP than by storage time' specimens bonded with FBS were not sensitive to storage time in the absence of PP, but showed lower bond strengths at 1 and 3 months in the presence of PP. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Topics
  • surface
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • composite
  • durability
  • resin
  • ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy