People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
De Munck, Jan
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (28/28 displayed)
- 2017Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surfacecitations
- 2017Residual compressive surface stress increases the bending strength of dental zirconiacitations
- 2016Influence of Light Irradiation Through Zirconia on the Degree of Conversion of Composite Cementscitations
- 2016Short fibre-reinforced composite for extensive direct restorations: a laboratory and computational assessment
- 2016Bonding Effectiveness of Luting Composites to Different CAD/CAM Materialscitations
- 2015Aging resistance of surface-treated dental zirconiacitations
- 2015Bonding Effectiveness to Differently Sandblasted Dental Zirconiacitations
- 2014Influence of sintering conditions on low-temperature degradation of dental zirconiacitations
- 2013Fracture toughness versus micro-tensile bond strength testing of adhesive-dentin interfaces.citations
- 2011Bonding effectiveness of luting composites to zirconia ceramics
- 2010Surface Roughness of Two Composites After Etching with Various Acids
- 2007Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin
- 2007Effects of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of an adhesive luting agent to CAD-CAM ceramic
- 2007Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin.
- 2006NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques.citations
- 2006Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching
- 2005Effect of fracture strength of primer-adhesive mixture on bonding effectiveness
- 2005A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results
- 2005Micro-rotary Fatigue Resistance of a HEMA-free One-step Adhesive
- 2005Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling.citations
- 2005A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results.citations
- 2005Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling
- 2005Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer
- 2005Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional intermediate elastic layer.citations
- 2004Fatigue resistance of dentin/composite interfaces with an additional shock-absorbing layer
- 2004Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin.citations
- 2003Microtensile bond strengths of an etch&rinse and self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment
- 2002Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG-lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin.citations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Phase-separation within HEMA-free all-in-one dental adhesives may result in the entrapment of droplets within the adhesive resin. Strongly air-blowing prior to polymerization, can remove most of these droplets. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect these droplets may have on the resistance of the adhesive-tooth interface to NaOCl degradation. METHODS: The micro-tensile bond strength (microTBS) to enamel and dentin was determined when a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive was applied either following a mild or strong air-blowing technique. The bonds were also exposed to an aqueous sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution for 1h, following a recently introduced methodology to mimic in vivo bond degradation. RESULTS: This study revealed that strong air-blowing of the adhesive only resulted in a significantly higher micro-tensile bond strength (microTBS) to dentin, but not to enamel. Likewise, NaOCl only reduced the microTBS to dentin for both the mild and strong air-blowing technique, but again not the microTBS to enamel. Failure analysis by SEM clearly revealed that strong air-blowing is less effective in droplet removal when the adhesive was applied in small and narrow class-I cavities, as compared to when it was applied to flat surfaces. CONCLUSIONS: NaOCl did preferentially dissolve the hybrid layer at dentin, and more for the mild than for the strong air-blowing technique. A strong air-blowing procedure resulted in a more NaOCl-resistant hybrid layer, so that it can be concluded that a HEMA-free one-step adhesive definitely benefits from a strong air-blowing technique.