Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Skalomenos, Konstantinos

  • Google
  • 10
  • 15
  • 87

University of Birmingham

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (10/10 displayed)

  • 2023A triaxiality‐dependent fracture model for hot‐rolled sections made of S355 steelcitations
  • 2023Testing of a Novel Induction Heat Treated Steel Brace with Enhanced Buckling Behaviour1citations
  • 2023Comparative study on fracture characteristics of carbon and stainless steel bolt material7citations
  • 2022Performance-based seismic design of intentionally eccentric IH-treated steel braced framescitations
  • 2021Seismic design of steel frames with intentionally eccentric induction-heat treated steel bracescitations
  • 2021Experimental study of ferritic stainless steel bolted T-stubs under monotonic loading15citations
  • 2020Multiple-damage state retrofit of steel MRFs with composite beams using a minimal-disturbance arm damper1citations
  • 2018Use of induction heating in steel structures: material properties and novel brace design15citations
  • 2017Inelastic behavior of circular concrete-filled steel tubes: monotonic versus cyclic response12citations
  • 2016Modeling of circular concrete-filled steel tubes subjected to cyclic lateral loading36citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kastiza, Pelagia
1 / 1 shared
Theofanous, Marios
3 / 24 shared
Jamshiyas, Shadiya
1 / 1 shared
Yuan, Huanxin
2 / 6 shared
Yapici, Orhan
2 / 5 shared
Afshan, Sheida
1 / 34 shared
Whittall, Thomas
2 / 2 shared
Dirar, Samir
1 / 15 shared
Kurata, Masahiro
2 / 2 shared
Marzano, Giuseppe A.
1 / 1 shared
Nishiyama, Minehiro
1 / 1 shared
Shimada, Hironari
1 / 1 shared
Hatzigeorgiou, George D.
2 / 2 shared
Beskos, Dimitri E.
2 / 2 shared
Serras, Dionisios N.
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2021
2020
2018
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kastiza, Pelagia
  • Theofanous, Marios
  • Jamshiyas, Shadiya
  • Yuan, Huanxin
  • Yapici, Orhan
  • Afshan, Sheida
  • Whittall, Thomas
  • Dirar, Samir
  • Kurata, Masahiro
  • Marzano, Giuseppe A.
  • Nishiyama, Minehiro
  • Shimada, Hironari
  • Hatzigeorgiou, George D.
  • Beskos, Dimitri E.
  • Serras, Dionisios N.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparative study on fracture characteristics of carbon and stainless steel bolt material

  • Yuan, Huanxin
  • Yapici, Orhan
  • Afshan, Sheida
  • Skalomenos, Konstantinos
  • Theofanous, Marios
Abstract

Bolt fracture often limits the ultimate strength and deformation capacity of bolted connections and leads to overall joint failure. Therefore, the prediction of structural collapse under extreme loads necessitates the incorporation of a reliable fracture model that reflects the observed structural response of bolts. This paper reports a comprehensive experimental and numerical study into the structural behaviour, ductility and fracture characteristics of Grade A4–80 austenitic stainless steel bolts and carbon steel 8.8 bolts in tension, which are commonly used as fasteners in bolted connections. Tensile tests were performed on smooth material coupons machined from both bolt grades to obtain the material response. Thereafter, tensile tests were performed on notched specimens from both grades, allowing the fracture characteristics to be studied over a range of stress triaxialities and the development of an equation relating the plastic strain at fracture to the stress triaxiality. 2D axisymmetric and 3D advanced finite element models were calibrated against the experimental results and damage propagation parameters. The developed numerical models are shown to perfectly replicate the observed experimental behaviour of the tested bolt materials under predominantly tensile loading, including fracture. Both experimental and numerical results confirm the superior ductility of A4–80 bolts over their 8.8 counterparts.

Topics
  • polymer
  • Carbon
  • stainless steel
  • strength
  • ductility