Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Harrouet, Titouan

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2023The effects of water table fluctuation on LNAPL deposit in highly permeable porous media: A coupled numerical and experimental study13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Deparis, Jacques
1 / 6 shared
Lion, Fabien
1 / 1 shared
Koohbor, Behshad
1 / 1 shared
Davarzani, Dorian
1 / 3 shared
Colombano, Stéfan
1 / 11 shared
Ataie-Ashtiani, Behzad
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Deparis, Jacques
  • Lion, Fabien
  • Koohbor, Behshad
  • Davarzani, Dorian
  • Colombano, Stéfan
  • Ataie-Ashtiani, Behzad
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

The effects of water table fluctuation on LNAPL deposit in highly permeable porous media: A coupled numerical and experimental study

  • Harrouet, Titouan
  • Deparis, Jacques
  • Lion, Fabien
  • Koohbor, Behshad
  • Davarzani, Dorian
  • Colombano, Stéfan
  • Ataie-Ashtiani, Behzad
Abstract

Light Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid (LNAPL) flow on the water table is highly mobile and is sensitive to the fluctuation of groundwater. This process is highly complex and involves the migration of three immiscible phases (i.e. water, LNAPL and air) which need the explicit definition of multiple parameters. A coupled experimental and numerical simulation methodology is performed by using Time Domain Reflectrometer (TDR) and multiphase simulation of a controlled environment to mimic the water table fluctuation and its effect on the LNAPL residual saturation. TDR probes are installed in different locations of a 2D tank (i.e. a cuboid box with relatively low off-plane thickness) and the bulk permittivity of the phases are measured through artificially imposed boundary conditions. The bulk permittivity is then translated into saturation of the three different phases. The translated residual saturations along with the previously measured porous media properties (e.g. porosity and saturated permeability) are then inserted into the numerical simulator (i.e. COMSOL Multiphysics®) and the migration of the three phase in porous media is simulated. The numerical exponents and entry pressures needed for the simulation of the multiphase flow are estimated using the temporal experimental values. The exponents of water LNAPL relative permeability were estimated to be around 2 while the exponents gas LNAPL relative permeability were estimated to be closer to 3. The results, simulated with the optimized parameters, are then evaluated with pictures taken from the transparent face of the 2D tank different stages of the experiment. The temporal evolution of different phase saturation has been compared and validated between the experimental results obtained and interpreted by the TDR probe measurements and the simulations. The relative error stays in the 5 % confidence level for most reported points and only in the highly dynamic flow time steps the error reaches around 12% which are discussed in the text and is accepted due to the highly nonlinear nature of the problem.

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • phase
  • experiment
  • simulation
  • permeability
  • porosity