Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Song, Hyunggwi

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 3

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Effect of fatigue loading and rest on impact strength of rat ulna3citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Andersen, Thomas Levin
1 / 2 shared
Warden, Stuart J.
1 / 1 shared
Pfister, Jennifer
1 / 1 shared
Kersh, Mariana E.
1 / 1 shared
Bhargava, Rohit
1 / 2 shared
Yan, Chenxi
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Andersen, Thomas Levin
  • Warden, Stuart J.
  • Pfister, Jennifer
  • Kersh, Mariana E.
  • Bhargava, Rohit
  • Yan, Chenxi
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of fatigue loading and rest on impact strength of rat ulna

  • Andersen, Thomas Levin
  • Warden, Stuart J.
  • Pfister, Jennifer
  • Song, Hyunggwi
  • Kersh, Mariana E.
  • Bhargava, Rohit
  • Yan, Chenxi
Abstract

<p>Stress fracture is a common injury among athletes and military personnel and is associated with fatigue-initiated damage and impact loading. The recovery of bending strength has been shown to be a function of the rest days allowed after fatigue loading in rodents and the aim of this study was to investigate if similar results would occur under impact conditions. In this study, cyclic axial compression load was applied in vivo on the right forelimbs while left forelimbs served as controls. Two rest groups were used: one day of rest and seven days of rest. Afterwards, all ulnae were scanned using micro-Computed Tomography followed by impact testing. The micro-CT scan confirmed the formation of woven bone on loaded ulnae after seven days rest. The peak impact force was 37.5% higher in the control (mean = 174.96 ± 33.25 N) specimens compared to the loaded bones (mean = 130.34 ± 22.37 N). Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy analyses suggested no significant change of chemical composition in the cortical region between the loaded and control ulnae, but woven bone region had lower carbonate and amide I content than contralateral controls (p &lt; 0.05). We find that cyclic fatigue loading had a negative effect on bone's impact response. Bones that experienced fatigue loading became less stiff, weaker, and more prone to fracture when subjected to impact. The formation of woven bone after seven days of rest did not restore the stiffness upon impact and confirm that rest time is crucial to the recovery of fatigue damage.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • fatigue
  • chemical composition
  • infrared spectroscopy
  • woven
  • computed tomography scan
  • impact response