Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Babiker, Hassan

  • Google
  • 5
  • 4
  • 24

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2016Demineralized bone matrix and human cancellous bone enhance fixation of porous-coated titanium implants in sheep6citations
  • 2013Evaluating of bone healing around porous coated titanium implant and potential systematic bias on the traditional sampling method1citations
  • 2012The effects of bone marrow aspirate, bone graft, and collagen composites on fixation of titanium implants17citations
  • 2010Demineralized bone matrix and human cancellous bone enhance fixation of titanium implantscitations
  • 2007The effect of bone marrow aspirate, bone graft and collagen composites on fixation of bone implantscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Ding, Ming
5 / 12 shared
Overgaard, Søren
5 / 7 shared
Sandri, Monica
1 / 4 shared
Tampieri, Anna
1 / 9 shared
Chart of publication period
2016
2013
2012
2010
2007

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Ding, Ming
  • Overgaard, Søren
  • Sandri, Monica
  • Tampieri, Anna
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluating of bone healing around porous coated titanium implant and potential systematic bias on the traditional sampling method

  • Ding, Ming
  • Babiker, Hassan
  • Overgaard, Søren
Abstract

<p>Introduction: The mechanical properties of bone can largely be explained by bone density and the anisotropic orientation of the trabecular bone. The type of trabecular structure plays an important role in determining the mechanical properties of cancellous bone. Gap-healing and implant fixation could be affected by the various quality and quantity of bone in the local environment. Thus, implant fixation in one part might differ from the other part of the implant. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the sampling method on data evaluation. Material and methods: Titanium alloy implants (Biomet Inc.) of 10. mm in length and 6. mm in diameter were inserted bilaterally into the proximal humerus of 8 skeletally mature sheep. Thus two implants with a concentric gap of 2. mm were implanted in each sheep. The gap was filled with allograft. Standardised surgical procedure was used. At sacrifice, 6 weeks after surgery, both proximal humeri were harvested. The specimens were randomized to superficial or profound groups. In the superficial group, mechanical testing or histological analysis was carried out on the superficial part of the implant. In the profound group, the mechanical testing or histological analysis was performed on the profound part of the implant. Result: The mechanical fixation, bone volume and bone ongrowth showed no statistically significant differences. Mechanical test demonstrated a slight tendency to increased strength and failure energy were observed in the superficial group. Histomorphomety revealed bone ongrowth was slightly increased and volume fraction was decreased in the profound group. Conclusion: Histological analysis and mechanical testing can be applied to the superficial or profound part of the implant.</p>

Topics
  • porous
  • density
  • strength
  • anisotropic
  • titanium
  • titanium alloy