Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Poulis, Hans

  • Google
  • 9
  • 16
  • 170

Delft University of Technology

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2022The influence of the surface roughness, creep and relaxation on the performance of elastomeric liners for sustainable glass bottle closures1citations
  • 2021The influence of grit blasting and UV/Ozone treatments on Ti-Ti adhesive bonds and their durability after sol-gel and primer application9citations
  • 2021The photostability and peel strength of ethylene butyl acrylate copolymer blends for use in conservation of cultural heritage3citations
  • 2020Influence of moisture and CO2 on the material behavior of thermoplastic elastomers for beer bottle closures2citations
  • 2020Enhanced Interface Adhesion by Novel Eco-Epoxy Adhesives Based on the Modified Tannic Acid on Al and CFRP Adherends15citations
  • 2020The Influence of Loading, Temperature and Relative Humidity on Adhesives for Canvas Lining6citations
  • 2020Improving the adhesion strength of polymers: effect of surface treatments48citations
  • 2017Laboratory strength testing of pine wood and birch bark adhesives: a first study of the material properties of pitch33citations
  • 2016Lap Shear and Impact Testing of Ochre and Beeswax in Experimental Middle Stone Age Compound Adhesives53citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Turan, Deniz
2 / 2 shared
Boshuizen, Bart
1 / 2 shared
Rans, Calvin
1 / 4 shared
Rodríguez, Laura Angélica Ardila
1 / 3 shared
Beerkens, L. G. M.
1 / 1 shared
Rie, E. René De La
1 / 2 shared
Mosleh, Yasmine
2 / 33 shared
Teixeira De Freitas, Sofia
1 / 33 shared
Vuksanović, Marija
1 / 7 shared
Živković, Andreja
1 / 2 shared
Tomić, Nataša Z.
1 / 20 shared
Marinković, Aleksandar
1 / 32 shared
Seymour, Kate
1 / 3 shared
Hamdi, Marouen
1 / 1 shared
Kozowyk, Paul
2 / 2 shared
Langejans, Geeske
2 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Turan, Deniz
  • Boshuizen, Bart
  • Rans, Calvin
  • Rodríguez, Laura Angélica Ardila
  • Beerkens, L. G. M.
  • Rie, E. René De La
  • Mosleh, Yasmine
  • Teixeira De Freitas, Sofia
  • Vuksanović, Marija
  • Živković, Andreja
  • Tomić, Nataša Z.
  • Marinković, Aleksandar
  • Seymour, Kate
  • Hamdi, Marouen
  • Kozowyk, Paul
  • Langejans, Geeske
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Laboratory strength testing of pine wood and birch bark adhesives: a first study of the material properties of pitch

  • Poulis, Hans
  • Kozowyk, Paul
  • Langejans, Geeske
Abstract

Adhesives are an important yet often overlooked aspect of human tool use. Previous experiments have shown that compound resin/gum adhesive production by anatomically modern humans was a cognitively demanding task that required advanced use of fire, forward planning, and abstraction among other traits. Yet the oldest known adhesives were produced by Neandertals, not anatomically modern humans. These tar or pitch adhesives are an entirely different material, produced from a distinct, albeit similarly complex process. However, the material properties of these adhesives and the influence of the production process on performance is still unclear. To this end we conducted a series of laboratory based lap shear and impact tests following modern adhesive testing standards and at three different temperatures to measure the strength of pine and birch pitch adhesives. We tested eight different recipes that contain charcoal as an additive (mimicking contamination) or were reduced by boiling for different lengths of time. Lap shear tests were conducted on wood and flint adherends to determine shear strength on different materials, and we conducted high load-rate tests to understand how the same material behaves under impact forces. Our results indicate that both pine and birch pitch adhesives behave similarly at room temperature. Pine pitch is highly sensitive to the addition of charcoal and further heating. Up to a certain extent charcoal additives increases performance, as does extra seething. However, too much charcoal and seething will reduce performance. Similarly, pine pitch is sensitive to ambient temperature changes and it is strongest at 0°C and weakest at 38°C. Adhesive failures occur in a similar manner on flint and wood suggesting the weakest part of a flint-adhesive-wood composite tool may have been the cohesive strength of the adhesive. Finally, pine pitch adhesives may be better suited to resisting high-load rate impacts than shear forces. Our experiments show that pitch production and post-production manipulation are sensitive processes, and to obtain a workable and strong adhesive one requires a deep understanding of the material properties. Our results validate previous archaeological adhesive studies that suggest that the manufacture and use of adhesives was an advanced technological process.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • compound
  • experiment
  • strength
  • shear test
  • composite
  • impact test
  • wood
  • resin