Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Benmokrane, B.

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 131

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2020Manufacturing and structural performance of glass-fiber-reinforced precast-concrete boat ramp planks21citations
  • 2020A New Design-Oriented Model of Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Reinforced Hollow Concrete Columns16citations
  • 2019Compressive behavior of axially loaded circular hollow concrete columns reinforced with GFRP bars and spirals94citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Weerakoon, S. Z.
1 / 1 shared
Sorbello, C. D.
1 / 1 shared
Cooper, D.
1 / 7 shared
Ferdous, Wahid
1 / 13 shared
Mendis, P.
2 / 4 shared
Karunasena, Karu
2 / 3 shared
Nguyen, K. T. Q.
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Weerakoon, S. Z.
  • Sorbello, C. D.
  • Cooper, D.
  • Ferdous, Wahid
  • Mendis, P.
  • Karunasena, Karu
  • Nguyen, K. T. Q.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Manufacturing and structural performance of glass-fiber-reinforced precast-concrete boat ramp planks

  • Benmokrane, B.
  • Weerakoon, S. Z.
  • Sorbello, C. D.
  • Cooper, D.
Abstract

Glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer (GFRP) bars are an ideal solution for eliminating the problems of steel corrosion in reinforced-concrete structures exposed to marine environments. The potential long-term benefits of the reduced maintenance costs and increased service life of GFRP-reinforced concrete structures have not been fully realized due to these reinforcing materials being more costly than steel bars. This study aims to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of GFRP bars as internal reinforcement in precast-concrete boat-ramp planks. This is the first study that provided a comparative evaluation of the manufacturing and structural performance of planks reinforced with GFRP bars or galvanized-steel bars to fully convince engineers and asset owners of the economic benefits of specifying and using GFRP bars in infrastructure projects. The results of the study revealed that the fabrication and installation of the reinforcing mesh constituted the main differences between planks reinforced with GFRP or galvanized steel. Overall, fabricating precast-concrete boat-ramp planks with two layers of GFRP bars required less labor and equipment, and yielded better serviceability and structural performance than the current plank design using galvanized steel. These benefits led to approval and publication of the standard drawings for a new plank design for implementation in boating-infrastructure projects in Australia.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • corrosion
  • glass
  • glass
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • steel
  • drawing