| People | Locations | Statistics |
|---|---|---|
| Naji, M. |
| |
| Motta, Antonella |
| |
| Aletan, Dirar |
| |
| Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
| Ertürk, Emre |
| |
| Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
| Kononenko, Denys |
| |
| Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
| Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
| Bih, L. |
| |
| Casati, R. |
| |
| Muller, Hermance |
| |
| Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
| Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
| Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
| Azam, Siraj |
| |
| Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
| Blanpain, Bart |
| |
| Ali, M. A. |
| |
| Popa, V. |
| |
| Rančić, M. |
| |
| Ollier, Nadège |
| |
| Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
| Landes, Michael |
| |
| Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Jahangir, Muhammad
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (3/3 displayed)
- 2024Harnessing the power of multifunctional γ-Fe2O3@CuO nanocompositescitations
- 2024Zinc‐based metal–organic frameworks for encapsulation and sustained release of ciprofloxacin for excellent antibacterial activitiescitations
- 2024Highly synergistic antibacterial activity of copper (II)-based nano metal–organic frameworkcitations
Places of action
| Organizations | Location | People |
|---|
article
Highly synergistic antibacterial activity of copper (II)-based nano metal–organic framework
Abstract
<p>Copper(II)-based metal–organic framework [Cu<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>8</sub>O<sub>7</sub>)(H<sub>2</sub>O)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>n</sub>, bulk crystals (Micro-MOF) and nano-MOF particles (Nano-MOF) were synthesized via the hydrothermal method(cit = citric acid(organic linker). The Cu(II) centers of this micro-MOFs, according to a single crystal X-ray study, are surrounded by a 3D structural network and two different coordination environments. The size of micro-MOF was around 200 m, but the width of nano-MOF as-synthesized was close to 120 ± 20 nm. Zone of inhibition and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests were used to determine the antibacterial effectiveness of the nano-MOF and micro-MOF particle against Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, respectively. While the MIC for micro-MOF is between 200 and 250 ppm and nano-MOF is between 150 and 200 ppm against E. coli and B. subtilis. respectively. The findings show that nano-MOF has more antibacterial power than micro-MOF and ligand by itself. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the delayed liberation of incorporating Cu<sup>2+</sup> ions were the foundation for a synergistic antibacterial mechanism that was also put forward.</p>