Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rebulla, Sergio Minera

  • Google
  • 11
  • 8
  • 134

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (11/11 displayed)

  • 2019Efficient 3D Stress Capture of Variable-Stiffness and Sandwich Beam Structures13citations
  • 2019Comparing the effect of geometry and stiffness on the effective load paths in non-symmetric laminatescitations
  • 2019Geometrically nonlinear finite element model for predicting failure in composite structures6citations
  • 2019On the accuracy of localised 3D stress fields in tow-steered laminated composite structures19citations
  • 2018Three-dimensional stress analysis for laminated composite and sandwich structures53citations
  • 2018Three-dimensional stress analysis for beam-like structures using Serendipity Lagrange shape functions33citations
  • 2017On the accuracy of the displacement-based Unified Formulation for modelling laminated composite beam structurescitations
  • 2017Linearized buckling analysis of thin-walled structures using detailed three-dimensional stress fields8citations
  • 2017Continuum mechanics of beam-like structures using onedimensional finite elements based on Serendipity Lagrange cross-sectional discretisations2citations
  • 20173D stress analysis for complex cross-section beams using unified formulation based on Serendipity Lagrange polynomial expansioncitations
  • 2017A Computationally Efficient Model for Three-dimensional Stress Analysis of Stiffened Curved Panelscitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Weaver, Pm
11 / 560 shared
Groh, Rainer Mj
3 / 45 shared
Patni, Mayank
11 / 14 shared
Pirrera, Alberto
11 / 85 shared
Odonnell, Matthew Philip
1 / 12 shared
Bisagni, Chiara
1 / 13 shared
Carrera, Erasmo
2 / 28 shared
Petrolo, Marco
1 / 11 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018
2017

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Weaver, Pm
  • Groh, Rainer Mj
  • Patni, Mayank
  • Pirrera, Alberto
  • Odonnell, Matthew Philip
  • Bisagni, Chiara
  • Carrera, Erasmo
  • Petrolo, Marco
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Three-dimensional stress analysis for beam-like structures using Serendipity Lagrange shape functions

  • Weaver, Pm
  • Rebulla, Sergio Minera
  • Carrera, Erasmo
  • Patni, Mayank
  • Petrolo, Marco
  • Pirrera, Alberto
Abstract

<p>Simple analytical and finite element models are widely employed by practising engineers for the stress analysis of beam structures, because of their simplicity and acceptable levels of accuracy. However, the validity of these models is limited by assumptions of material heterogeneity, geometric dimensions and slenderness, and by Saint-Venant's Principle, i.e. they are only applicable to regions remote from boundary constraints, discontinuities and points of load application. To predict accurate stress fields in these locations, computationally expensive three-dimensional (3D) finite element analyses are routinely performed. Alternatively, displacement based high-order beam models are often employed to capture localised three-dimensional stress fields analytically. Herein, a novel approach for the analysis of beam-like structures is presented. The approach is based on the Unified Formulation by Carrera and co-workers, and is able to recover complex, 3D stress fields in a computationally efficient manner. As a novelty, purposely adapted, hierarchical polynomials are used to define cross-sectional displacements. Due to the nature of their properties with respect to computational nodes, these functions are known as Serendipity Lagrange polynomials. This new cross-sectional expansion model is benchmarked against traditional finite elements and other implementations of the Unified Formulation by means of static analyses of beams with different complex cross-sections. It is shown that Serendipity Lagrange elements solve some of the shortcomings of the most commonly used Unified Formulation beam models based on Taylor and Lagrange expansion functions. Furthermore, significant computational efficiency gains over 3D finite elements are achieved for similar levels of accuracy.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy