Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Malcher, L.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 4
  • 198

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2014An extended GTN model for ductile fracture under high and low stress triaxiality198citations
  • 2011A MICROMECHANICAL CONSTITUTIVE MODEL FOR DUCTILE FRACTURE: NUMERICAL TREATMENT AND CALIBRATION STRATEGYcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cesar De Sa, Jmac
1 / 4 shared
Andrade Pires, Fma
1 / 5 shared
De Sa, Jmac
1 / 2 shared
Pires, Fma
1 / 14 shared
Chart of publication period
2014
2011

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cesar De Sa, Jmac
  • Andrade Pires, Fma
  • De Sa, Jmac
  • Pires, Fma
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

An extended GTN model for ductile fracture under high and low stress triaxiality

  • Cesar De Sa, Jmac
  • Malcher, L.
  • Andrade Pires, Fma
Abstract

This contribution provides an improvement on GTN model upon the prediction of fracture location within low level of stress triaxiality. In the proposition, two distinct damage parameters are introduced as internal variables of the degradation process and an effective damage is calculated as a sum of both contributions in the post-processed step. In the beginning, the volume void fraction, based on conservation mass law, is assumed as the first damage parameter, similar to Gurson's original model. This volumetric damage contribution is able to capture spherical void growth, which plays the main role in tensile loading condition. The second damage parameter is proposed as a new shear mechanism, based on geometrical and phenomenological aspects and is also a function of the equivalent plastic strain, Lode angle and stress triaxiality. The shear damage parameter is formulated independent of the volume void fraction and requires a new nucleation of micro-defects mechanism to trigger the shear growth contribution, and hence is able to capture elongated (and rotation) void growth which is present in simple shear and combined shear/tensile or shear/compression loading conditions. Furthermore, the first and the second damage parameters are coupled in the yield function in order to affect the hydrostatic stress and deviatoric stress contributions, separately. In the first part of this paper, a review of Gurson's model and its most famous version as GTN's model is done. After that, the new contribution is presented and an implicit numerical integration algorithm is determined, based on the operator split methodology. The calibration strategy is discussed for determination of material parameters. Numerical tests are performed for a butterfly specimen using two types of materials (aluminum alloy 2024-T351 and steel 1045) under ranges of stress triaxiality between-1/3 < eta < 1/3 (shear/compression or shear/tensile). At the end, the behavior of internal variables is analyzed, such as: evolution of both damage parameters, evolution of the equivalent plastic strain, the reaction curve and the contour of the effective damage parameter. The results obtained are compared with experimental data and have shown that the present formulation performs well in the prediction of the fracture location and determination of the correct level of equivalent plastic strain at fracture under predominant shear loading condition.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • aluminium
  • steel
  • void