Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rahim, Muhammad Abdul

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 68

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Microfluidic fabrication and characterization of Sorafenib-loaded lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery68citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Correia, Alexandra
1 / 10 shared
Madni, Asadullah
1 / 2 shared
Tahir, Nayab
1 / 2 shared
Li, Wei
1 / 1 shared
Santos, Hélder A.
1 / 31 shared
Khan, Muhammad Muzamil
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Correia, Alexandra
  • Madni, Asadullah
  • Tahir, Nayab
  • Li, Wei
  • Santos, Hélder A.
  • Khan, Muhammad Muzamil
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Microfluidic fabrication and characterization of Sorafenib-loaded lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles for controlled drug delivery

  • Correia, Alexandra
  • Madni, Asadullah
  • Tahir, Nayab
  • Li, Wei
  • Santos, Hélder A.
  • Rahim, Muhammad Abdul
  • Khan, Muhammad Muzamil
Abstract

Lipid polymer hybrid nanoparticles (LPHNPs) have been merged as potential nanocarriers for treatment of cancer. In the present study, LPHNPs loaded with Sorafenib (SFN) were prepared with PLGA, Lecithin and DSPE-PEG 2000 by using the bulk nanoprecipitation and microfluidic (MF) co-flow nanoprecipitation techniques. Herein, a glass capillary microfluidic device was primed to optimize the LPHNPs and compared to the bulk nanoprecipitation method. The morphological analysis of prepared LPHNPs revealed the well-defined spherical nano-sized particles in bulk nanoprecipitation method. Whereas, core shell morphology was observed in the MF method. The formulation prepared by the MF method (MF1-MF3) indicated relatively higher % EE (95.0%, 93.8% and 88.7%) and controlled release of the SFN from the particles as compared to the LPHNPs obtained by the bulk nanoprecipitation method. However, the release of SFN from all LPHNP formulation followed Higuchi model (R2 = 0.9901-0.9389) with Fickian diffusion mechanism. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and powder X-rays diffraction (pXRD) studies depicted the compatibility of SFN with all the structural components. In addition, the colloidal stability, in vitro cytotoxicity and cell growth inhibition studies of LPHNPs also demonstrated stability in biological media, biocompatibility and safety with enhanced anti-proliferative effects than the free SFN in breast cancer and prostate cancer cells. In conclusion, LPHNPs provided a prospective platform for the cancer chemotherapy and substantially improved the knowledge of fabrication and optimization of the hybrid nanoparticles.

Topics
  • nanoparticle
  • polymer
  • glass
  • glass
  • differential scanning calorimetry
  • Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
  • biocompatibility