Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Healy, Andrew

  • Google
  • 4
  • 10
  • 214

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2019Comparison of fused-filament fabrication to direct compression and injection molding in the manufacture of oral tablets58citations
  • 2019Influence of annealing and biaxial expansion on the properties of poly(l-lactic acid) medical tubing20citations
  • 2018Material considerations for fused-filament fabrication of solid dosage forms127citations
  • 2018Degradable nanocomposites for fused filament fabrication applications9citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Major, Ian
3 / 41 shared
Mcconville, Christopher
2 / 11 shared
Fuenmayor, Evert
3 / 12 shared
Lyons, Sean
4 / 36 shared
Forde, Martin
2 / 3 shared
Devine, Declan
3 / 34 shared
Doran, Patrick
1 / 4 shared
Dillon, Brian
1 / 3 shared
Geever, Luke
1 / 31 shared
Waldron, Cathal
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Major, Ian
  • Mcconville, Christopher
  • Fuenmayor, Evert
  • Lyons, Sean
  • Forde, Martin
  • Devine, Declan
  • Doran, Patrick
  • Dillon, Brian
  • Geever, Luke
  • Waldron, Cathal
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparison of fused-filament fabrication to direct compression and injection molding in the manufacture of oral tablets

  • Major, Ian
  • Mcconville, Christopher
  • Fuenmayor, Evert
  • Lyons, Sean
  • Forde, Martin
  • Healy, Andrew
  • Devine, Declan
Abstract

<p>Oral tablets are a convenient form to deliver active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) and have a high level of acceptance from clinicians and patients. There is a wide range of excipients available for the fabrication of tablets thereby offering a versatile platform for the delivery of therapeutic agents to the gastrointestinal tract. However, the geometry of tablets is limited by conventional manufacturing processes. This study aimed to compare three manufacturing processes in the production of flat-faced oral tablets using the same formulation composed of a polymer blend and caffeine as a model drug: fused-filament fabrication (FFF), direct compression (DC) and injection molding (IM). Hot-melt extrusion was used to convert a powder blend into feedstock material for FFF and IM processes, while DC was performed on the powder mixture. Tablets were produced with the same dimensions and were characterized for their physical and dissolution properties. There were statistical differences in the physical properties and drug release profiles of the tablets produced by the different manufacturing processes. DC tablets displayed immediate release, IM provided sustained release over 48 h, and FFF tablets displayed both release types depending on the printing parameters. FFF continues to demonstrate high potential as a manufacturing process for the efficient production of personalized oral tablets.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • melt
  • injection molding
  • field-flow fractionation
  • polymer blend
  • melt extrusion