Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Oord, J. Van

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 18

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Numerical simulations of bubble formation in liquid metal18citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Baltussen, Maike
1 / 2 shared
Kuipers, Hans
1 / 9 shared
Peters, Frank
1 / 6 shared
Plas, D. Van Der
1 / 2 shared
Odyck, D. E. A. Van
1 / 1 shared
Mirsandi, H.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Baltussen, Maike
  • Kuipers, Hans
  • Peters, Frank
  • Plas, D. Van Der
  • Odyck, D. E. A. Van
  • Mirsandi, H.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Numerical simulations of bubble formation in liquid metal

  • Baltussen, Maike
  • Kuipers, Hans
  • Peters, Frank
  • Plas, D. Van Der
  • Oord, J. Van
  • Odyck, D. E. A. Van
  • Mirsandi, H.
Abstract

<p>The process of bubble formation from submerged orifices is encountered in various industrial applications. It is therefore essential to understand the dynamics of bubble formation under such conditions. In the present work, the process of bubble formation in a steel-argon system is studied using the Local Front Reconstruction Method (LFRM), a Front Tracking method that enables the simulation of interface merging and breakup. The numerical simulations are performed over a wide range of gas injection rates to study the bubble formation dynamics under quasi-static and dynamic regimes. The simulation results show that the detached bubbles in a steel-argon system are generally bigger compared to the bubbles detached in a water-air system due to higher surface tension and lower wettability. In liquid cross-flow, the bubble at the orifice mouth becomes asymmetric due to the drag force created by the liquid flow. Under non-wetting conditions, the bubble can slide over the orifice without forming a bubble neck when the orifice plate is sufficiently large. On the other hand, under wetting conditions, the detached bubble volume decreases when the orifice plate is gradually tilted from a horizontal to vertical orientation at lower shear rates. However, this trend reverses at higher shear rates because the drag force exerted by the flowing liquid becomes dominant.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • simulation
  • steel
  • forming