Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sri-Amphorn, Pimpisut

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 373

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2020Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Parameters for Improved PLA and ABS 3D Printed Structures373citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Fernando, Anura
1 / 3 shared
Abeykoon, Chamil
1 / 43 shared
Chart of publication period
2020

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Fernando, Anura
  • Abeykoon, Chamil
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Parameters for Improved PLA and ABS 3D Printed Structures

  • Fernando, Anura
  • Sri-Amphorn, Pimpisut
  • Abeykoon, Chamil
Abstract

3D printing is a popular technique for fabricating three-dimensional solid objects from a digital design. In order to produce high quality 3D printed parts, the appropriate selection of printing parameters is crucial. This research is focused on studying the properties of 3D printed specimens (i.e., mechanical, thermal and morphological) with varying processing conditions such as infill pattern, infill density and infill speed, and also with different printing materials. A number of testing techniques such as tensile, bending, compression, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), thermal imaging, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were used for performing a comprehensive analysis. The results showed that Young’s modulus of the printed parts increased with the increase of infill density. Parts with 100% infill density obtained the highest Young’s modulus of 1538.05 MPa. Of the tested infill speeds from 70-110 mm/s; 90 mm/s infill speed gave the highest Young’s modulus. Meanwhile, there was a slight difference of Young’s modulus between low speeds (70 mm/s and 80 mm/s) and high speeds (100 mm/s and 110 mm/s) compared to the commonly used infill speed of 90 mm/s. The level of crystallinity of the 3D printed PLA specimens did not directly influence the mechanical properties as was confirmed by the DSC results. SEM images showed that the strength of the printed samples was dependent upon the arrangement of their layers. Furthermore, it was found that the most appropriate processing temperature and infill speed for PLA filament are 215 °C and 90 mm/s, respectively. Carbon fibre reinforced PLA (CFR-PLA) gave the highest Young’s modulus of 2637.29 MPa at 90 mm/s. Voids inside the matrix and the gaps between layers lead to initiation of cracks of the specimens. Overall, 100% infill density, 90 mm/s infill speed, 215 °C of set nozzle temperature, and the linear fill pattern were the possible optimal process settings for the most improved performance of the five different printing materials used in this study.

Topics
  • Deposition
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • scanning electron microscopy
  • crack
  • strength
  • thermogravimetry
  • differential scanning calorimetry
  • void
  • crystallinity
  • gravimetric analysis
  • thermography