Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Yun, Xiao

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 11

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2016Ice formation in the subcooled brine environment11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Hales, Alastair
1 / 3 shared
Cheng, Yan
1 / 2 shared
Brooks, Sam
1 / 1 shared
Quarini, Joe
1 / 1 shared
Lucas, Eddie
1 / 1 shared
Mcbryde, Dan
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Hales, Alastair
  • Cheng, Yan
  • Brooks, Sam
  • Quarini, Joe
  • Lucas, Eddie
  • Mcbryde, Dan
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Ice formation in the subcooled brine environment

  • Hales, Alastair
  • Cheng, Yan
  • Yun, Xiao
  • Brooks, Sam
  • Quarini, Joe
  • Lucas, Eddie
  • Mcbryde, Dan
Abstract

Generating ice in a fluid immiscible with water is relatively easy but considerably more difficult if the chosen fluid is hydrophilic. Our experimental work showed that, ice can be produced when water is introduced to a bath of subcooled brine and it was believed that, the rate of heat transfer between the two fluids needs to be higher than that of mass transfer to allow the formation of ice to occur as a result. Flow rheology, hence the size of the active surface area of the injected water stream, brine temperature and concentration are the key factors influencing how much ice can be made in the process. Conversion ratios of two ice collection methods are compared over a range of brine temperatures and concentrations. The washing method (wet collection) was found to collect up to 27% more ice than dry collection. Washing is also very effective in rinsing off the brine and salt on the ice’s surface and the bulk salinity would drop from 13% to 1%. Since the evaporator temperature has to be higher than the eutectic point of brine, it was suggested that, the coefficient of performance, COP, will be very promising. In addition, this way of ice production should achieve higher efficiency than a scraped surface ice maker and it is simpler in that it requires no complex mechanical harvesting equipment, and with the vast liquid–liquid surface areas possible, promises to be able to produce high quantities of ice per unit volume of equipment.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • washing