Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Duffy, Lesley

  • Google
  • 3
  • 7
  • 69

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2015Mapping the carriage of flaA-restriction fragment length polymorphism Campylobacter genotypes on poultry carcases through the processing chain and comparison to clinical isolates9citations
  • 2015Genomic characterization of atypical enteropathogenic E. coli (aEPEC) strains from Australian cattlecitations
  • 2014Quantitative effects of in-line operations on Campylobacter and Escherichia coli through two Australian broiler processing plants60citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cobbold, Rowland
2 / 2 shared
Blackall, Patrick
2 / 2 shared
Fegan, Narelle
3 / 3 shared
Mellor, Glen
1 / 2 shared
Barlow, Robert
1 / 1 shared
Delannoy, Sabine
1 / 1 shared
Fach, Patrick
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2015
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cobbold, Rowland
  • Blackall, Patrick
  • Fegan, Narelle
  • Mellor, Glen
  • Barlow, Robert
  • Delannoy, Sabine
  • Fach, Patrick
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Quantitative effects of in-line operations on Campylobacter and Escherichia coli through two Australian broiler processing plants

  • Cobbold, Rowland
  • Duffy, Lesley
  • Blackall, Patrick
  • Fegan, Narelle
Abstract

Campylobacter is an important food borne pathogen which has mostly been associated with poultry. A lack of through chain quantitative Campylobacter data has been previously highlighted within quantitative risk assessments. The aim of this study was to quantitatively and qualitatively measure both Campylobacter and Escherichia coli contamination of chicken carcases through poultry slaughter. Chickens (n=10) were sampled from each of four Flocks at six sampling sites along the processing chain, caecum, before scald, after scald, before chill, after chill and after packaging. The overall prevalence of Campylobacter after packaging was 82.5% with an average count of 4.40 log10 CFU/carcase.All Flocks had a significant reduction in counts of Campylobacter and E. coli from before scald to after packaging. The processing points of scald and chilling had significant average reductions of both Campylobacter (1.82 and 2.48 log10 CFU/carcase) and E. coli (1.41 and 2.38 log10 CFU/carcase). The counts of E. coli and Campylobacter were significantly correlated throughout processing indicating E. coli may be a useful indicator organism for reductions in Campylobacter levels. The carriage of each species varied between Flocks, with Flocks 1 and 3 dominated by C. coli and Flocks 2 and 4 dominated by C. jejuni. Current industry processing practices can lead to significant reductions in the level of Campylobacter on whole chickens. Further understanding of the effect of interventions on Campylobacter, as applied in the poultry processing chain, may enable more targeted interventions to reduce the level of contamination and hence lead to future public health benefits.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy