Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Achintha, Mithila

  • Google
  • 17
  • 30
  • 234

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (17/17 displayed)

  • 2024Glass–GFRP Laminate: A Proof of Concept Experimental Investigation2citations
  • 2023Exploration of Waste Glass Powder as Partial Replacement of Cement in Concrete2citations
  • 2022Glass–GFRP Sandwich: Structurally Superior Laminated Glasscitations
  • 2020Development of cohesive zone models for the prediction of damage and failure of glass/steel adhesive joints41citations
  • 2019Failure prediction and optimal selection of adhesives for glass/steel adhesive joints20citations
  • 2018Strength evaluation and failure prediction of bolted and adhesive glass/steel joints20citations
  • 2016A review on design, manufacture and mechanics of composite risers64citations
  • 2015An CFRP fabrics as internal reinforcement in concrete beamscitations
  • 2015An experimentally validated contour method/eigenstrains hybrid model to incorporate residual stresses in glass structural designs13citations
  • 2015Experimental and numerical investigation of residual stress relaxation in shot-peened notch geometries under low-cycle fatiguecitations
  • 2014Fatigue behaviour of geometric features subjected to laser shock peening72citations
  • 2014Hybrid contour method/eigenstrain model for predicting residual stress in glasscitations
  • 2012Fatigue behaviour of geometric features subjected to laser shock peeningcitations
  • 2012Fatigue behaviour of geometric features subjected to laser shock peening:9th Fatigue Damage of Structural Materials Conferencecitations
  • 2012Prediction of FRP debonding Using the global-energy-balance approachcitations
  • 2011Optimising LSP conditions and modelling the geometric effects on residual stresscitations
  • 2009Fracture mechanics of plate debondingcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Yildirim, Feyza
2 / 2 shared
Wang, Yong
1 / 21 shared
Chand, Gaurav
1 / 4 shared
Thomsen, Ole
2 / 16 shared
Feih, Stefanie
3 / 4 shared
Katsivalis, Ioannis
3 / 14 shared
Thomsen, Ole Thybo
1 / 60 shared
Pham, Dinh-Chi
1 / 1 shared
Sridhar, N.
1 / 4 shared
Qian, Xudong
1 / 1 shared
Shenoi, Ajit
1 / 2 shared
Sobey, Adam
1 / 9 shared
Bloodworth, A. G.
1 / 3 shared
Alami, F.
1 / 1 shared
Balan, B.
2 / 3 shared
You, Chao
1 / 4 shared
Reed, Philippa
1 / 9 shared
Soady, K. A.
1 / 6 shared
Sackett, E.
1 / 4 shared
Fufari, D.
1 / 3 shared
Nowell, D.
1 / 10 shared
Bache, M.
1 / 4 shared
Sackett, Liz
2 / 2 shared
Nowell, David
3 / 3 shared
Bache, Martin
2 / 5 shared
Furfari, Domenico
2 / 4 shared
Guan, G.
1 / 1 shared
Burgoyne, C.
2 / 4 shared
Withers, Phillip
1 / 1 shared
Shapiro, Karen
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2020
2019
2018
2016
2015
2014
2012
2011
2009

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Yildirim, Feyza
  • Wang, Yong
  • Chand, Gaurav
  • Thomsen, Ole
  • Feih, Stefanie
  • Katsivalis, Ioannis
  • Thomsen, Ole Thybo
  • Pham, Dinh-Chi
  • Sridhar, N.
  • Qian, Xudong
  • Shenoi, Ajit
  • Sobey, Adam
  • Bloodworth, A. G.
  • Alami, F.
  • Balan, B.
  • You, Chao
  • Reed, Philippa
  • Soady, K. A.
  • Sackett, E.
  • Fufari, D.
  • Nowell, D.
  • Bache, M.
  • Sackett, Liz
  • Nowell, David
  • Bache, Martin
  • Furfari, Domenico
  • Guan, G.
  • Burgoyne, C.
  • Withers, Phillip
  • Shapiro, Karen
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Development of cohesive zone models for the prediction of damage and failure of glass/steel adhesive joints

  • Thomsen, Ole
  • Feih, Stefanie
  • Katsivalis, Ioannis
  • Achintha, Mithila
Abstract

The use of mild steel/tempered glass adhesive joints has increased rapidly over recent years. Cohesive zone modelling (CZM) is used extensively for the numerical analysis and failure prediction of adhesive joints. As the bonding to the glass surface is generally weaker than the bonding to metal substrates, and therefore the development of cohesive laws by testing on different substrates generally leads to overoptimistic and non-conservative predictions. However, the interface characterisation using standardised methods for glass/steel joints is complicated due to the relatively low strength of the glass substrate leading to premature failure. This paper presents modifications proposed for the Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) and End Notched Flexure (ENF) tests used to extract traction-separation laws for glass/steel adhesive joints in fracture modes I and II. For this purpose, an in-house glass heat strengthening process was developed. The cohesive laws were validated by comparing the numerical predictions for two different adhesives with experimental tests obtained for double lap shear joints subjected to four different load cases.This is the first time, traction-separation laws were extracted and validated against experimental data using glass substrates.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • glass
  • glass
  • strength
  • steel