Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Rothery, David

  • Google
  • 1
  • 6
  • 30

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2010Constraints on Mercury’s surface composition from MESSENGER and ground-based spectroscopy30citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Cloutis, E.
1 / 1 shared
Warell, J.
1 / 1 shared
Lewis, N.
1 / 5 shared
Sprague, A.
1 / 1 shared
Kozlowski, R.
1 / 2 shared
Helbert, J.
1 / 4 shared
Chart of publication period
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Cloutis, E.
  • Warell, J.
  • Lewis, N.
  • Sprague, A.
  • Kozlowski, R.
  • Helbert, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Constraints on Mercury’s surface composition from MESSENGER and ground-based spectroscopy

  • Cloutis, E.
  • Warell, J.
  • Rothery, David
  • Lewis, N.
  • Sprague, A.
  • Kozlowski, R.
  • Helbert, J.
Abstract

The composition and chemistry of Mercury’s regolith has been calculated from MESSENGER MASCS 0.3–1.3 μm spectra from the first flyby, using an implementation of Hapke’s radiative transfer-based photometric model for light scattering in semi-transparent porous media, and a linear spectral mixing algorithm. We combine this investigation with linear spectral fitting results from mid-infrared spectra and compare derived oxide abundances with mercurian formation models and lunar samples. Hapke modeling results indicate a regolith that is optically dominated by finely comminuted particles with average area weighted grain size near 20 lm. Mercury shows lunar-style space weathering, with maturation-produced microphase iron present at ~0.065 wt.% abundance, with only small variations between mature and immature sites, the amount of which is unable to explain Mercury’s low brightness relative to the Moon. The average modal mineralogies for the flyby 1 spectra derived from Hapke modeling are 35–70% Na-rich plagioclase or orthoclase, up to 30% Mg-rich clinopyroxene, <5% Mg-rich orthopyroxene, minute olivine, ~20–45% low-Fe, low-Ti agglutinitic glass, and <10% of one or more lunar-like opaque minerals. Mercurian average oxide abundances derived from Hapke models and mid-infrared linear fitting include 40–50 wt.% SiO2, 10–35 wt.% Al2O3, 1–8 wt.% FeO, and <25 wt.% TiO2; the inferred rock type is basalt. Lunar-like opaques or glasses with high Fe and/or Ti abundances cannot on their own, or in combination, explain Mercury’s low brightness. The linear mixing results indicate the presence of clinopyroxenes that contain up to 21 wt.% MnO and the presence of a Mn-rich hedenbergite. Mn in M1 crystalline lattice sites of hedenbergite suppresses the strong 1 and 2 lm crystal field absorption bands and may thus act as a strong darkening agent on Mercury. Also, one or more of thermally darkened silicates, Fepoor opaques and matured glasses, or Mercury-unique Ostwald-ripened microphase iron nickel may lower the albedo. A major part of the total microphase iron present in Mercury’s regolith is likely derived from FeO that is not intrinsic to the crust but has been subsequently delivered by exogenic sources.

Topics
  • porous
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • mineral
  • surface
  • grain
  • nickel
  • grain size
  • glass
  • glass
  • iron
  • crystalline lattice
  • Mercury
  • light scattering