Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kehinde, Oluyemi

  • Google
  • 2
  • 5
  • 1

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2024Critical methods of geopolymer feedstocks activation for suitable industrial applications1citations
  • 2021Development of a Solar Powered Electric Shuttlecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Amalu, Dr Emeka
1 / 19 shared
Hughes, David
1 / 16 shared
Oyawale, F.
1 / 1 shared
Efemwenkiekie, U. K.
1 / 1 shared
Babaremu, K. O.
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Amalu, Dr Emeka
  • Hughes, David
  • Oyawale, F.
  • Efemwenkiekie, U. K.
  • Babaremu, K. O.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Critical methods of geopolymer feedstocks activation for suitable industrial applications

  • Kehinde, Oluyemi
  • Amalu, Dr Emeka
  • Hughes, David
Abstract

<p>As health and safety issues emanating from human activities on terrestrial environment is becoming ever challenging, the production of Ordinary Portland Cement is identified as a key contributor. This technology threatens environmental quality by emitting significant quantity of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) that threatens Net Zero delivery. Consequently, the development of cement alternatives with substantial CO<sub>2</sub> reduction/sequestration during production has become imperative. Geopolymers obtained from industrial residues are poised as promising alternatives in managing environmental systems but selection of appropriate method of activation has limited their wider industrial applications. This article discusses four key activation methods and their combinations used in four main feedstocks to advise on their energy requirements, product compressive strength and environmental/industrial applications. Reviewing and characterising 302 published literatures with focus on most relevant and recent advances in the field, this review found that hybrid techniques combining mechanical activation method produces geopolymers with the highest compressive strength and thus the best method. Geopolymer made by mechano-chemical activation method of slag achieved the highest compressive strength while geopolymer produced by microwave assisted activation of clay and ultrasonic activation of fly ash cum slag are most economical in curing energy demand. Hybrid activation is the current development in the field and integration of this method with mechanical activation is poised as the future geopolymer activation technology as it demonstrates greatest efficiency potential.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • strength
  • cement
  • ultrasonic
  • activation
  • curing