People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Forest, Laurent
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (12/12 displayed)
- 2020Realistic Model to Predict the Macrostructure of GTAW Welds for the Simulation of Ultrasonic Non destructive Testingcitations
- 2020Test blanket modules (ITER) and breeding blanket (DEMO): History of major fabrication technologies development of HCLL and HCPB and statuscitations
- 2020Status of the EU DEMO breeding blanket manufacturing R&D activitiescitations
- 2020Status of the EU DEMO breeding blanket manufacturing R&D activitiescitations
- 2019Towards a model for predicting the macrostructure of multipass GTAW weld of austenitic stainless steel
- 2018Status of the EU DEMO breeding blanket manufacturing RetD activities
- 2018The European ITER Test Blanket Modules: Fabrication R&D progress for HCLL and HCPBcitations
- 2017Assessment of HCLL-TBM optimum welding sequence scenario to minimize welding distortionscitations
- 2016The European ITER test blanket modules: Progress in development of fabrication technologies towards standardizationcitations
- 2016Assessment of HCLL-TBM optimum welding sequence scenario to minimize welding distortions
- 2015The European ITER Test Blanket Modules: Current status of fabrication technologies development and a way forwardcitations
- 2013Numerical Simulation of Hot Cracking Tests
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Test blanket modules (ITER) and breeding blanket (DEMO): History of major fabrication technologies development of HCLL and HCPB and status
Abstract
Two breeding blanket concepts, the Helium-Cooled Lithium-Lead (HCLL) and the Helium-Cooled Pebble-Bed (HCPB), developed in Europe in the frame of DEMO and relevant TBM studies, present many similarities in terms of design and manufacturing. As an example, all structure sub-components are internally cooled by helium circulating in meandering squared section channels. Several technologies have been investigated in the frame of EU fusion research programme for the manufacturing, including a specialized machining, fusion and diffusion welding and joints inspection, of DEMO breeding blanket and TBM sub-components (Cooling Plates (CP), Side Caps (SCs), Stiffening Plates (SPs), First Wall (FW)) and their assembly, main of which are discussed in this paper. The manufacturability of DEMO blanket modules Back Supporting Structure (BSS), a big structure located behind blanket modules and supporting them, is also discussed. The applicability of technologies takes into account specificities of EUROFER97 steel, foreseen as structural material.For each assessed technology, main results, e.g. in terms of mechanical properties and microstructure of weld joints, are presented and main advantages and drawbacks are summed up, in order to identify most promising technology/ies and to propose manufacturing scenarios. It should be noted that these developments are performed according to standards and professional codes (RCC-MRx). Further development strategies are also briefly discussed in the paper.