Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Moore, John R.

  • Google
  • 1
  • 2
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Stand density and genetic improvement have site-specific effects on the economic returns from Pinus radiata plantations13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Dash, Jonathan P.
1 / 1 shared
Klápště, Jaroslav
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Dash, Jonathan P.
  • Klápště, Jaroslav
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Stand density and genetic improvement have site-specific effects on the economic returns from Pinus radiata plantations

  • Moore, John R.
  • Dash, Jonathan P.
  • Klápště, Jaroslav
Abstract

<p>Intensively managed forests are expected to play an increasingly important role in meeting future global demand for wood products. To meet this challenge, a key focus will be on lifting yields from these forests along with economic returns. In this study, we used data from a long-term series of trials that were established in radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) to examine the effect that stand density, deployment of genetically-improved seedlots, and site have on economic returns. This dataset comprised end-of-rotation assessments of eight installations of a trial series in New Zealand that spanned a wide range of site productivity. Each installation typically contained four seedlots with differing levels of genetic improvement growing at three levels of stand density. Mixed effects models were used to examine the effects of stand density, site, seedlot genetic rating, and their interactions on Total Value (NZ$ ha<sup>−1</sup>) and Relative Value (NZ$ m<sup>−3</sup>). There was a strong positive relationship between stand density and Total Value, but there was generally no significant relationship between stand density and Relative Value. Of the variation in Total Value not explained by the fixed effect of stand density, approximately 60% was due to differences among trial installations (i.e. site) and 5–7% was due to seedlot genetic worth. There were significant first order interactions between seedlot and site, and between site and stand density. Seedlot genetic worth was able to explain a higher proportion of the variation in Relative Value (between 10 and 18% depending on the genetic trait under consideration). The genetic worth of a seedlot in terms of stem straightness rating was able to explain the greatest proportion of variation in Relative Value. These results highlight the importance of the choice of location and stand density management have on the economic returns from intensively-managed forests. While seedlot genetic rating has a smaller effect on economic returns, improvements in traits such as stem straightness and branch characteristics also make an important contribution. As silvicultural practices move towards higher stand densities, and the next generation of genetically improved trees are deployed, a more precise understanding of the interactions of site, silviculture and genetics will be needed. New ways of testing and modelling these interactions will be required but will ensure the delivery of a more informed approach to forest management.</p>

Topics
  • density
  • wood