Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sager, Valeska Farah

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 33

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2021Printability, stability and sensory properties of protein-enriched 3D-printed lemon mousse for personalised in-between meals33citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Riantiningtyas, Reisya Rizki
1 / 1 shared
Ahrné, Lilia
1 / 9 shared
Thybo, Camilla Doris
1 / 1 shared
Chow, Ching Yue
1 / 1 shared
Bredie, Wender
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Riantiningtyas, Reisya Rizki
  • Ahrné, Lilia
  • Thybo, Camilla Doris
  • Chow, Ching Yue
  • Bredie, Wender
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Printability, stability and sensory properties of protein-enriched 3D-printed lemon mousse for personalised in-between meals

  • Riantiningtyas, Reisya Rizki
  • Ahrné, Lilia
  • Thybo, Camilla Doris
  • Sager, Valeska Farah
  • Chow, Ching Yue
  • Bredie, Wender
Abstract

3D printing of foods is an emerging technology with the potential to develop nutritious and appetising foods to accommodate needs of special consumer groups. For the technology to succeed, studies need to address the composition of printable foods and the stability of printed matrices delivering acceptable sensory properties. This study investigated the effect of gelatine (1–2% w/w), citric acid (0.9–1.5% w/w) and whey protein isolate (WPI) (8–18% w/w) concentration in lemon mousse formulations on printability, physical and sensory properties. The textural properties of the mousses before printing were highly influenced by the concentration of gelatine and WPI but less by citric acid. Gelatine had a gel firming effect, giving a higher firmness and yield stress in mousses, while WPI softened the gel structure. The gel firming effect of gelatine was beneficial to produce 3D-printed mousses with good storage stability after printing, while the addition of WPI gave better-defined layers and a glossier surface of the 3D-printed mousses. The extrusion process disrupted the foam structure, creating a more uniform air bubble distribution, but decreasing the firmness and resilience of the mousses, nevertheless, sensorial attractive and stable 3D-printed mousses were obtained. Increasing WPI concentration in mousses enhanced the shiny appearance, smooth texture and melting mouthfeel. It reduced the rough surface, lumpy and compact texture in mousses, which were associated with the gel firming effect of gelatine. This work shows that protein-enriched 3D-printed lemon mousses with good printability, stability and high consumer acceptance can be produced by formulation design.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • extrusion
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • texture