Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Olsen, Martin Due

  • Google
  • 3
  • 6
  • 35

Technical University of Denmark

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFT12citations
  • 2023Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFT12citations
  • 2023Comparison of models for the relative static permittivity with the e-CPA equation of state11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kontogeorgis, Georgios, M.
1 / 1 shared
De Hemptinne, Jean-Charles
1 / 2 shared
Liang, Xiaodong
3 / 9 shared
Von Solms, Nicolas
3 / 11 shared
Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
2 / 18 shared
Hemptinne, Jean-Charles De
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kontogeorgis, Georgios, M.
  • De Hemptinne, Jean-Charles
  • Liang, Xiaodong
  • Von Solms, Nicolas
  • Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
  • Hemptinne, Jean-Charles De
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFT

  • Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
  • Hemptinne, Jean-Charles De
  • Liang, Xiaodong
  • Von Solms, Nicolas
  • Olsen, Martin Due
Abstract

Many different models have been published with the aim of describingelectrolyte thermodynamics. In this study two successful Equations ofState (EoS) are compared. The models investigated in this work are theelectrolyte Cubic Plus Association (e-CPA) EoS and the electrolyte PolarPertubed Chain Statistical Associating Fluid Theory (e-PPC-SAFT). Themodel terms are not changed from previous works, but they arereparameterized with various models for the relative staticpermittivity. The models are parameterized as similarly and fairly aspossible by identifying key parameters in the models that are intendedto describe the same physics. Several different sets of comparableparameters are investigated to test the models with the inclusion ofvarious physics, and to avoid favoring one model due to the choice ofadjustable parameters. The parameters of the models are optimized withan objective function containing the properties mean ionic activitycoefficients (MIAC), osmotic coefficients and density in a widetemperature range of 273.15–473.15 K and they are tested for theirability to quantitatively describe these properties. The differencebetween e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFT is generally found to be relatively minorand the permittivity model and considered adjustable parameters aregenerally more important for the overall model performance. It is foundthat the permittivity models that only predict part of experimentaldecrease tend to perform the best for the properties MIAC, osmoticcoefficients and density. It is also found that including bothassociation parameters and dispersion/attractive parameters for ions isbetter than neglecting one type of parameters, even when the same numberof adjustable parameters is included. To be able to capture thetemperature trend of MIAC it is found to be important to include anadditional temperature dependency, which in this work is a temperaturedependent interaction parameter for the physical term. It is also foundthat it is important to include sufficiently strong ion association tobe able to obtain the correct qualitative trend for individual ionactivity coefficients.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • dispersion
  • inclusion
  • theory
  • constant potential amperometry