Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Olsen, Martin Due

  • Google
  • 3
  • 6
  • 35

Technical University of Denmark

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFT12citations
  • 2023Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFT12citations
  • 2023Comparison of models for the relative static permittivity with the e-CPA equation of state11citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Kontogeorgis, Georgios, M.
1 / 1 shared
De Hemptinne, Jean-Charles
1 / 2 shared
Liang, Xiaodong
3 / 9 shared
Von Solms, Nicolas
3 / 11 shared
Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
2 / 18 shared
Hemptinne, Jean-Charles De
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Kontogeorgis, Georgios, M.
  • De Hemptinne, Jean-Charles
  • Liang, Xiaodong
  • Von Solms, Nicolas
  • Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
  • Hemptinne, Jean-Charles De
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Comparison of models for the relative static permittivity with the e-CPA equation of state

  • Kontogeorgis, Georgios M.
  • Liang, Xiaodong
  • Von Solms, Nicolas
  • Olsen, Martin Due
Abstract

This study compares five different models of the relative static permittivity when they are used in the electrolyte Cubic Plus Association (e-CPA) equation of state. To get the best possible performance of the models, the parameters of e-CPA are readjusted for every model. Two different combinations of adjustable parameters are tested. The static permittivity models that are compared include both simple correlations and theoretically derived expressions. A new theoretically based model, that has not been applied to e-CPA before, is also investigated. The novel model describes the impact ions have on the relative static permittivity based on water–ion association. The model is parameterized in two ways: firstly, so that the model describes the reported experimental relative static permittivity data, and secondly to describe the permittivity when kinetic depolarization is not included. All the models are tested for their quantitative agreement with mean ionic activity coefficients (MIAC), osmotic coefficients and density. The model that describes the experimental data the best is the one based on ion association, when it is parameterized to describe the experimental relative static permittivity data. The prediction of the individual ion activity coefficients (IIAC) is also investigated. The only model that is capable of describing the qualitative trend of the IIAC data is the ion association model, but the quantitative agreement with the IIAC data is quite poor. Because of this, an additional parameterization of the ion association model is performed based on an altered parameter optimization strategy. It is shown that with the new parameterization it is possible to describe the IIAC data well, without significant loss of performance for any of the other properties.

Topics
  • density
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • constant potential amperometry