People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Liang, Xiaodong
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (9/9 displayed)
- 2024Investigation of the Alcohols and Water Hydrogen Bonding Structure via Monomer Fraction Studiescitations
- 2024The Connection between the Debye and Güntelberg Charging Processes and the Importance of Relative Permittivity: The Ionic Cloud Charging Processcitations
- 2023On the estimation of equivalent conductivity of electrolyte solutions; The effect of relative static permittivity and viscositycitations
- 2023Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFTcitations
- 2023Comparisons of equation of state models for electrolytes: e-CPA and e-PPC-SAFTcitations
- 2023Comparison of models for the relative static permittivity with the e-CPA equation of statecitations
- 2023How to account for the concentration dependency of relative permittivity in the Debye–Hückel and Born equationscitations
- 2022Importance of the Relative Static Permittivity in electrolyte SAFT-VR Mie Equations of Statecitations
- 2022The true Hückel equation for electrolyte solutions and its relation with the Born termcitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Comparison of models for the relative static permittivity with the e-CPA equation of state
Abstract
This study compares five different models of the relative static permittivity when they are used in the electrolyte Cubic Plus Association (e-CPA) equation of state. To get the best possible performance of the models, the parameters of e-CPA are readjusted for every model. Two different combinations of adjustable parameters are tested. The static permittivity models that are compared include both simple correlations and theoretically derived expressions. A new theoretically based model, that has not been applied to e-CPA before, is also investigated. The novel model describes the impact ions have on the relative static permittivity based on water–ion association. The model is parameterized in two ways: firstly, so that the model describes the reported experimental relative static permittivity data, and secondly to describe the permittivity when kinetic depolarization is not included. All the models are tested for their quantitative agreement with mean ionic activity coefficients (MIAC), osmotic coefficients and density. The model that describes the experimental data the best is the one based on ion association, when it is parameterized to describe the experimental relative static permittivity data. The prediction of the individual ion activity coefficients (IIAC) is also investigated. The only model that is capable of describing the qualitative trend of the IIAC data is the ion association model, but the quantitative agreement with the IIAC data is quite poor. Because of this, an additional parameterization of the ion association model is performed based on an altered parameter optimization strategy. It is shown that with the new parameterization it is possible to describe the IIAC data well, without significant loss of performance for any of the other properties.