People | Locations | Statistics |
---|---|---|
Naji, M. |
| |
Motta, Antonella |
| |
Aletan, Dirar |
| |
Mohamed, Tarek |
| |
Ertürk, Emre |
| |
Taccardi, Nicola |
| |
Kononenko, Denys |
| |
Petrov, R. H. | Madrid |
|
Alshaaer, Mazen | Brussels |
|
Bih, L. |
| |
Casati, R. |
| |
Muller, Hermance |
| |
Kočí, Jan | Prague |
|
Šuljagić, Marija |
| |
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-Artemi | Brussels |
|
Azam, Siraj |
| |
Ospanova, Alyiya |
| |
Blanpain, Bart |
| |
Ali, M. A. |
| |
Popa, V. |
| |
Rančić, M. |
| |
Ollier, Nadège |
| |
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro |
| |
Landes, Michael |
| |
Rignanese, Gian-Marco |
|
Legarth, Brian Nyvang
Technical University of Denmark
in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%
Topics
Publications (30/30 displayed)
- 2024Particle-matrix debonding with Strength-Differential effects
- 2024Temperature-dependent changes in thermoplastic sandwich core properties and failure mechanisms using four-point tests with short specimens
- 2024Mode-III fracture toughness measurements of foam-cored sandwich composites using a constrained Shear-Torsion-Bending specimen
- 2022A Modified Shear Torsion Bending Test for Mode-III Fracture Toughness Measurements of Face/Core Interfaces in Sandwich Composites
- 2022A special finite element method applied to off-axis tunnel cracking in laminatescitations
- 2022An efficient stiffness degradation model for layered composites with arbitrarily oriented tunneling and delamination crackscitations
- 2021Introduction to the finite element solid formulation
- 2021A novel test fixture for mode III fracture characterization of monolithic laminates and composite sandwich specimenscitations
- 2021Approach for analysing off-axis tunnelling cracks in biaxially loaded laminatescitations
- 2019Development of a Mode III Test Rig for Composite Laminates and Sandwich Face/Core Fracture Characterization
- 2015Plasticity dependent damage evolution in composites with strain-gradient effectscitations
- 2015Effect of fiber positioning on mixed-mode fracture of interfacial debonding in compositescitations
- 2015Effect of fiber positioning on mixed-mode fracture of interfacial debonding in compositescitations
- 2014A numerical study of the influence of microvoids in the transverse mechanical response of unidirectional compositescitations
- 2014A numerical study of the influence of microvoids in the transverse mechanical response of unidirectional compositescitations
- 2014A numerical study of the influence of microvoids in the transverse mechanical response of unidirectional compositescitations
- 2014On the homogenization of metal matrix composites using strain gradient plasticitycitations
- 2013Experimental and numerical study of the micro-mechanical failure in composites
- 2013Experimental and numerical study of the micro-mechanical failure in composites
- 2013A deformation mechanism map for polycrystals modeled using strain gradient plasticity and interfaces that slide and separatecitations
- 2013Micromechanical modeling of unidirectional composites with uneven interfacial strengthscitations
- 2013Micromechanical modeling of unidirectional composites with uneven interfacial strengthscitations
- 2013A new macroscopically anisotropic pressure dependent yield function for metal matrix composite based on strain gradient plasticity for the microstructurecitations
- 2013Fracture of anisotropic materials with plastic strain-gradient effects
- 2012Debonding analyses in anisotropic materials with strain- gradient effects
- 2012Debonding Analyses in Anisotropic Materials with Strain-Gradient Effects
- 2011Size-effects on yield surfaces for micro reinforced compositescitations
- 2010Debonding failure and size effects in micro reinforced compositescitations
- 2005Effects of geometrical anisotropy on failure in a plastically anisotropic metal
- 2004Particle debonding using different yield criteriacitations
Places of action
Organizations | Location | People |
---|
article
Particle-matrix debonding with Strength-Differential effects
Abstract
In this work the onset of failure caused by particle-matrix debonding in aluminum alloy 2090-T3 and magnesium alloy AZ31 under either overall uniaxial plane strain tension or compression load is studied numerically using a unit cell model. Especially for magnesium AZ31, experiments show a significant difference in the tensile-compressive yield stresses, the so-called Strength-Differential-effect (SD-effect). This SD-effect cannot be captured by any isotropic yield function and only by recent anisotropic yield functions. To accurately model AA 2090-T3 and magnesium AZ31 the general yield function by Yoon et al. (2014) is adopted in addition to the isotropic von Mises plasticity yield function and the anisotropic yield function of Hill (1948). The numerically predicted strain at which void nucleation initiates is generally found to be larger for magnesium AZ31 than for AA 2090-T3. However, depending on the orientation of the principal axes of plastic anisotropy this void nucleation strain varies significantly. This holds true for both materials, but the void nucleation strain of AA 2090-T3 in compression is numerically predicted to be practically identical whether or not isotropic or anisotropic plasticity is considered. In tension the void nucleation strain of AA 2090-T3 based on anisotropic plasticity is found to be more than double the strain obtained by von Mises plasticity. The numerically predicted void nucleation strain of magnesium AZ31 is significantly affected by the yield function adopted. For the von Mises yield function the value of the void nucleation strain is in between the predictions based on the anisotropic yield functions. For both tension and compression, the yield function of Yoon et al. (2014) results in the largest void nucleation strain, whereas the yield function of Hill results in the smallest strain value. This holds true for all five orientations of the principal axes of plastic anisotropy investigated.