Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Kumar, Dr. Krishna

  • Google
  • 4
  • 13
  • 104

Lund University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (4/4 displayed)

  • 2023Evaluating 28-Days Performance of Rice Husk Ash Green Concrete under Compression Gleaned from Neural Networks3citations
  • 2023Performance prognosis of FRCM-to-concrete bond strength using ANFIS-based fuzzy algorithm36citations
  • 2022Enhancing Sustainability of Corroded RC Structures26citations
  • 2022Prediction of FRCM–Concrete Bond Strength with Machine Learning Approach39citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Rai, Hardeep Singh
2 / 3 shared
Kumar, Aman
4 / 8 shared
Onyelowe, Kennedy C.
1 / 3 shared
Singh, Sharanjit
1 / 4 shared
Arora, Harish Chandra
4 / 8 shared
Kapoor, Nishant Raj
2 / 5 shared
Garg, Harish
1 / 1 shared
Singh, Rohan
1 / 2 shared
Bahrami, Alireza
1 / 41 shared
Majumdar, Arnab
1 / 3 shared
Mohammed, Mazin Abed
1 / 2 shared
Khamaksorn, Achara
1 / 1 shared
Thinnukool, Orawit
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Rai, Hardeep Singh
  • Kumar, Aman
  • Onyelowe, Kennedy C.
  • Singh, Sharanjit
  • Arora, Harish Chandra
  • Kapoor, Nishant Raj
  • Garg, Harish
  • Singh, Rohan
  • Bahrami, Alireza
  • Majumdar, Arnab
  • Mohammed, Mazin Abed
  • Khamaksorn, Achara
  • Thinnukool, Orawit
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Performance prognosis of FRCM-to-concrete bond strength using ANFIS-based fuzzy algorithm

  • Garg, Harish
  • Kumar, Aman
  • Arora, Harish Chandra
  • Kumar, Dr. Krishna
Abstract

<p>Nowadays, strengthening of reinforced concrete structures with a new class of sustainable materials is the possible solution to retrofit the aged deteriorated structures. It is difficult to predict the capacity of the strengthened (FRP/FRCM) reinforced concrete elements without considering the bond strength. Therefore, the concrete substrate to Fibre-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) bond is a crucial parameter in the strengthening procedures. As it is known, bond strength is dependent on various parameters, which increases the complexity of the FRCM-to-concrete bond. Analytical models cannot provide a high degree of accuracy, as their predictions are only valid for specific datasets. Machine learning algorithms are the best-suited solution to deal with bond strength like complex problems. In this study, curve-fitting, Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) models have been applied to 336 aggregated datasets. Nine performance matrices have been opted to compare the performance of the developed models. Feature importance analysis has also been used to check the rationality of the model. The parametric analysis has also been done using the 3D-surface plot of the ANFIS model. The R-values of ANFIS, GPR, and curve-fitting models are 0.9895, 0.9882, and 0.9145, respectively. The mean absolute error, root mean square error and Nash-Sutcliffe index of the ANFIS model are 0.9168 kN, 1.4326 kN, and 0.9791, respectively. The mean absolute percentage error of the ANFIS model is 11.19%, which is 8.72% and 76.78% lower than GPR and curve-fitting model, respectively. The error range of the curve-fitting, GPR and ANFIS models are −17.06 kN to 18.04 kN, −4.39 kN to 6.07 kN, and −4.23 kN to 5.19 kN, respectively. Overfitting analysis of the proposed models has been done, and the predicted results show that the curve-fitting model and GPR models are inferior and the ANFIS model is superior based on the selected performance matrices. The overfitting value of ANFIS model is 67.89% and 8.31% lower than curve-fitting and GPR model, respectively. The sensitivity analysis found that the number of layers, the width of the concrete block, and the compressive strength of the concrete had the highest effect on the FRCM-to-concrete bond strength. The findings of the study have the potential to decrease costs and save time by employing an accurate prediction approach instead of expensive and time-consuming testing. The developed model can be easily used by industry experts and FRCM applicators to estimate the bonding strength of FRCM-to-concrete substrate for sustainable designs.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • strength
  • machine learning