Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Wolters, Mees

  • Google
  • 1
  • 3
  • 0

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2024Debonding behavior of non-welded wrapped composite X-joints subjected to monotonic tensile load – Numerical study and validationcitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Waltener, Clement
1 / 1 shared
He, Pei
1 / 3 shared
Pavlovic, Marko
1 / 16 shared
Chart of publication period
2024

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Waltener, Clement
  • He, Pei
  • Pavlovic, Marko
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Debonding behavior of non-welded wrapped composite X-joints subjected to monotonic tensile load – Numerical study and validation

  • Waltener, Clement
  • Wolters, Mees
  • He, Pei
  • Pavlovic, Marko
Abstract

<p>The dominant failure mode in the non-welded wrapped composite joints made with GFRP composite material wrapped around steel circular hollow sections (CHS) is characterized as interface debonding. However, in the ultimate load joint experiments, debonding process was merely inferred from the surface strain distribution obtained by the digital image correlation (DIC). A thorough understanding and explicit illustration of debonding mechanism in wrapped composite X-joints is needed with help of finite element modeling (FEM), in order to provide prediction models for design of wrapped composite joints in engineering structures. In this paper, two FE models were developed to simulate the debonding behavior of small-scale and medium-scale wrapped composite 45° X-joints in monotonic tensile tests previously conducted by the authors. A new strategy of modeling complex composite geometry using 4-node tetrahedral elements (C3D4) without defining composite lay-up was proposed. The cohesive zone modeling (CZM) approach was utilized to simulate the debonding behavior of composite-steel interface with introduction of a new four-linear traction-separation law. The generated FE models were validated by good agreement between numerical and experimental results in terms of load-displacement response and surface strain distribution throughout the failure process at two joint scales. The validated models gained good insight into the joint debonding mechanism and determined the surface strain threshold for quantifying the debonding length. Development and validation of the FE models with unique set of parameters aligned well with the experiment results at two different scales is an important step for prediction and design of wrapped composite joints.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • experiment
  • steel
  • composite
  • aligned