Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Sørensen, Jesper Harrild

  • Google
  • 6
  • 3
  • 26

Technical University of Denmark

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (6/6 displayed)

  • 2024Full-scale tests of two-storey precast reinforced concrete shear walls:Investigation of strength and deformation capacity1citations
  • 2024Full-scale tests of two-storey precast reinforced concrete shear walls1citations
  • 2023MINIMASS: a new approach for low-carbon, low-cost 3D printed concrete beamscitations
  • 2022Compression Strength of Reinforced Concrete Cubes Pre-Cracked by Uniaxial and Biaxial Tensioncitations
  • 2021Keyed shear connections with looped U‐bars subjected to normal and shear forces Part I: Experimental investigation12citations
  • 2021Keyed shear connections with looped U‐bars subjected to normal and shear forces Part I12citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Poulsen, Peter Noe
4 / 23 shared
Hoang, Linh Cao
5 / 31 shared
Coward, Andy
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2024
2023
2022
2021

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Poulsen, Peter Noe
  • Hoang, Linh Cao
  • Coward, Andy
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Full-scale tests of two-storey precast reinforced concrete shear walls

  • Poulsen, Peter Noe
  • Sørensen, Jesper Harrild
  • Hoang, Linh Cao
Abstract

<p>Precast concrete structures behave differently than equivalent in-situ cast solutions mainly because of the narrow connections between the precast elements. In this context, the keyed shear connections are of particular interest, as they have to ensure structural integrity in order to transfer shear- and normal stresses between adjacent elements. Extensive experimental studies (based on push-off tests) of this type of connection have been conducted in the past. These tests typically showed significant softening in the post-peak regime of the shear-slip relationship. It is for this reason important to study how effectively such connections can be utilised on the level of structural systems, where redistribution of internal forces is often required to reach the global load carrying capacity. This paper presents results from full-scale testing of two precast shear wall structures. The structures were two stories high and simulated a typical segment of precast buildings in practice. Each test structure was composed of 12 precast elements (decks and walls) and tested to failure under a combination of vertical and horizontal loads. The main varying parameter between the two tests is the design shear capacity of the keyed connections, which was doubled from test T2 to test T3 by increasing the diameter and the yield strength of the U-bar loops. Both structures displayed a ductile failure with significant deformation capacity. However, despite the higher strength in the keyed connections, the load carrying capacity of test T3 was not increased compared to test T2. This behaviour can be explained by a comprehensive analysis of the measured deformation field obtained from 2D Digital Image Correlation. By comparing the deformations with information obtained from independent component push-off tests with equivalent connections, it is possible to pinpoint the different stress regimes that the critical connection experienced, when the test structure reached its load carrying capacity. The results show that at that point in time, large parts of the critical connection were still in the pre-peak shear-slip regime, while another part located between two window openings was already at the end of the post-peak regime with practically no residual strength left. The findings indicate that the effective design strength of connections should be chosen with caution when modern numerical rigid-plastic methods are used to calculate the load carrying capacity of precast structural systems.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • strength
  • yield strength