Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Mills, Julie E.

  • Google
  • 2
  • 7
  • 130

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (2/2 displayed)

  • 2023Punching Shear Behaviour and Repair Efficiency of Reinforced Eco-friendly Lightweight Concrete Slabs23citations
  • 2022Mechanical performance and durability of geopolymer lightweight rubber concrete107citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Agwaa, Ibrahim Saad
1 / 1 shared
Tayeh, Bassam A.
1 / 9 shared
Youssf, Osama
2 / 8 shared
Hassanli, Reza
2 / 10 shared
Gravina, Rebecca J.
1 / 1 shared
Zhuge, Yan
1 / 7 shared
Roychand, Rajeev
1 / 3 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Agwaa, Ibrahim Saad
  • Tayeh, Bassam A.
  • Youssf, Osama
  • Hassanli, Reza
  • Gravina, Rebecca J.
  • Zhuge, Yan
  • Roychand, Rajeev
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Punching Shear Behaviour and Repair Efficiency of Reinforced Eco-friendly Lightweight Concrete Slabs

  • Agwaa, Ibrahim Saad
  • Mills, Julie E.
  • Tayeh, Bassam A.
  • Youssf, Osama
  • Hassanli, Reza
Abstract

<p>In this study, the behaviour of eco-friendly concrete (Eco-Con) reinforced slabs was investigated by testing the structural behaviour of two-way slabs under punching shear, and by testing the performance of Eco-Con when used as a simulated repair material for one-way slabs under 4-point bending. Four Eco-Con mixes with the same target compressive strength of 32 MPa were used. The mixes consisted of one Portland cement concrete (CC) as the control mix, and three Eco-Con mixes namely: geopolymer rubber (GR), geopolymer lightweight expanded clay aggregate “LECA” (GL), and rubber engineered cementitious composite (RECC). The results for slabs subjected to punching shear showed 32 %, and 37 % less strength and 9 %, and 23 % less deflection when using Eco-Con concrete mixes GR and GL, respectively compared with the CC mix. The strength of Eco-Con RECC slab slightly decreased by 7 %, but its deflection capacity increased by 20 %, compared with the CC slab. The bending tests of ‘repaired’ slabs showed comparable slab bending strength capacity and ultimate deflection with the CC slab when using GR or GL mixes as the slab repair material. However, using RECC showed an increase in the slab bending strength capacity by 14 % and doubled the ultimate deflection, compared with the CC mix.</p>

Topics
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • strength
  • composite
  • cement
  • bending flexural test
  • rubber