Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Caspeele, Robby

  • Google
  • 14
  • 33
  • 224

Ghent University

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (14/14 displayed)

  • 2022Development of conformity criteria for durability and its influence on service life predictionscitations
  • 2022Preliminary investigation of the long-term deformations of self-healing concrete with superabsorbent polymerscitations
  • 2021Quantification of model uncertainties of the energy-based method for dynamic column removal scenarios17citations
  • 2021Effects of the fire decay phase on the bending capacity of a fire-exposed reinforced concrete slabcitations
  • 2021Evaluation of test methods for self-healing concrete with macrocapsules by inter-laboratory testingcitations
  • 2021Evaluation of test methods for self-healing concrete with macrocapsules by inter-laboratory testingcitations
  • 2020Addressing the need for standardization of test methods for self-healing concrete : an inter-laboratory study on concrete with macrocapsules68citations
  • 2020Addressing the need for standardization of test methods for self-healing concrete: an inter-laboratory study on concrete with macrocapsules.citations
  • 2020Addressing the need for standardization of test methods for self-healing concrete: an inter-laboratory study on concrete with macrocapsules68citations
  • 2018Experimental investigation into the effects of membrane action for continuous reinforced glass beam systems5citations
  • 2017Performance of statically indeterminate reinforced glass beams : experimental comparison with determinate systems and effect of a discontinuous glass section11citations
  • 2016Development of reinforced and posttensioned glass beams:review of experimental research55citations
  • 2013Probabilistic FAD and ductile tearing assessmentcitations
  • 2010Use of water demand and consistency prediction models as steering elements for the production of ready-mixed concretecitations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Vereecken, Eline
1 / 1 shared
Van Mullem, Tim
5 / 12 shared
De Belie, Nele
6 / 101 shared
Van Coile, Ruben
3 / 9 shared
Botte, Wouter
1 / 1 shared
Merci, Bart
1 / 1 shared
Lucherini, Andrea
1 / 3 shared
Jovanović, Balša
1 / 4 shared
Lombaert, Geert
1 / 3 shared
Reynders, Edwin
1 / 2 shared
Bumanis, Girts
5 / 8 shared
Vanoutrive, Hanne
5 / 22 shared
Litina, Chrysoula
5 / 9 shared
Al-Tabbaa, Abir
5 / 30 shared
Kwiecien, Arkadiusz
3 / 4 shared
Tulliani, Jean Marc
2 / 3 shared
Anglani, Giovanni
5 / 15 shared
Antonaci, Paola
4 / 21 shared
Gruyaert, Elke
5 / 41 shared
Dudek, Marta
5 / 5 shared
Bajare, Diana
5 / 17 shared
Van Tittelboom, Kim
5 / 36 shared
Stryszewska, Teresa
5 / 5 shared
Kwiecień, Arkadiusz
2 / 9 shared
Jean-Marc, Tulliani
3 / 3 shared
Martens, Kenny
3 / 3 shared
Belis, Jan
1 / 20 shared
Belis, Jlif Jan
2 / 3 shared
Dann, Markus
1 / 1 shared
Gao, Ming
1 / 2 shared
Maes, Marc
1 / 1 shared
Minne, Peter
1 / 2 shared
De Schutter, Geert
1 / 61 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2021
2020
2018
2017
2016
2013
2010

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Vereecken, Eline
  • Van Mullem, Tim
  • De Belie, Nele
  • Van Coile, Ruben
  • Botte, Wouter
  • Merci, Bart
  • Lucherini, Andrea
  • Jovanović, Balša
  • Lombaert, Geert
  • Reynders, Edwin
  • Bumanis, Girts
  • Vanoutrive, Hanne
  • Litina, Chrysoula
  • Al-Tabbaa, Abir
  • Kwiecien, Arkadiusz
  • Tulliani, Jean Marc
  • Anglani, Giovanni
  • Antonaci, Paola
  • Gruyaert, Elke
  • Dudek, Marta
  • Bajare, Diana
  • Van Tittelboom, Kim
  • Stryszewska, Teresa
  • Kwiecień, Arkadiusz
  • Jean-Marc, Tulliani
  • Martens, Kenny
  • Belis, Jan
  • Belis, Jlif Jan
  • Dann, Markus
  • Gao, Ming
  • Maes, Marc
  • Minne, Peter
  • De Schutter, Geert
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Quantification of model uncertainties of the energy-based method for dynamic column removal scenarios

  • Caspeele, Robby
  • Van Coile, Ruben
  • Botte, Wouter
Abstract

The Alternative Load Path (ALP) method is widely used to assess progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete (RC) structures by notional removal of one or more load-bearing elements. In general, a nonlinear time history analysis (NTHA) is needed to perform such an analysis if dynamic effects are explicitly taken into account. To avoid cumbersome nonlinear dynamic analyses, the energy-based method (EBM) is a promising technique to predict the maximum dynamic responses of a structural system. In this article, the accuracy and precision of the EBM is evaluated based on a validated finite element model of a tested RC slab subjected to a sudden column removal scenario, in particular in relation to the investigation of tensile membrane action (TMA). Influences of dynamic effects are evaluated, i.e. in relation to strain rate effects, damping, and the time duration of support removals. Strain rate effects are observed to have only slight influences on the dynamic responses. The strain rate dependency of reinforcement is found to have a more significant influence on the responses in TMA stage, although also to a limited extent. The magnitude of the load has a significant influence on the dynamic response, as do increasing damping ratios due to the corresponding significant energy dissipation. Finally, the dynamic response reduces with increasing time duration of the column removal. Based on the results of the stochastic analyses, the EBM is observed to perform well based on a comparison with the results of NTHA in both flexural and TMA stages. Furthermore, in relation to the analyzed case studies on reinforced concrete slabs, the model uncertainty of the responses obtained through the EBM compared with the NTHA is found to be represented well by a lognormal distribution with mean of 0.95 and a standard deviation of 0.20, for evaluating the loads of first rupture of reinforcement. Furthermore, a lognormal distribution with mean 0.96 and standard deviation 0.13 is found appropriate to represent the model uncertainty on ultimate load-bearing capacity predictions. Model uncertainties are also obtained with respect to the model predictions for displacements at the moment of the first rupture of reinforcement, displacements at the ultimate load-bearing capacities, and both loads and displacements at second load peaks.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy