Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Steimbreger, Ceferino

  • Google
  • 3
  • 5
  • 23

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (3/3 displayed)

  • 2023ASSESSMENT OF FATIGUE BEHAVIOUR OF UHSS STEEL BUTT-WELDED JOINTS BY MEANS OF A FRACTURE MECHANICS METHODOLOGYcitations
  • 2022Effect of welding processes on the fatigue behaviour of ultra-high strength steel butt-welded joints17citations
  • 2018Influence of static strength on the fatigue resistance of welds6citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Vuherer, Tomaž
2 / 16 shared
Chapetti, Mirco
3 / 4 shared
Gubeljak, Nenad
3 / 36 shared
Ernst, Wolfgang
3 / 13 shared
Enzinger, Norbert
3 / 96 shared
Chart of publication period
2023
2022
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Vuherer, Tomaž
  • Chapetti, Mirco
  • Gubeljak, Nenad
  • Ernst, Wolfgang
  • Enzinger, Norbert
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of welding processes on the fatigue behaviour of ultra-high strength steel butt-welded joints

  • Vuherer, Tomaž
  • Chapetti, Mirco
  • Steimbreger, Ceferino
  • Gubeljak, Nenad
  • Ernst, Wolfgang
  • Enzinger, Norbert
Abstract

<p>In the last decades, advances in steel manufacturing made possible the use of high-strength steel (HSS) and ultra-high strength steel (UHSS) for several applications, such as bridges, cranes, offshore structures, oil pipelines and automotive parts. Capacity of withstanding loads with reduced cross-section and minimum weight could be efficiently increased. Since most structures need to be joined, welding procedures are a major issue in mechanical design of HSS elements. Particularly in construction codes and design documents, it is normally assumed that fatigue resistance of as-welded joints is independent of strength level. Nevertheless, fatigue loaded as-welded components with high quality welds or post-weld treated joints could experience benefits from the use of HSS as the base material (BM). The purpose of the present work is to analyse fatigue behaviour of ultra-high strength steel butt-welded joints, by means of experimental testing and a fracture mechanics approach. Sheets of steel S960MC and S960QL were joined with different welding techniques: Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW), Laser Hybrid Welding (LHW) and Electron Beam Welding (EBW). Fatigue tests were performed with stress ratio R=0.1, under four points bending loading. All specimens exhibited fatigue crack initiation and subsequent propagation from the weld toe area, near the heat affected zone (HAZ). Different S[sbnd]N curves were obtained for the different welding processes. The Resistance Curve methodology was employed to assess the effect of microstructure, defect size, hardness, and joint geometry resulting from each technique. This fracture mechanics approach allowed to estimate the relative influence of the different geometrical and mechanical parameters of the weld and showed that joint geometry could not explain by itself the differences in fatigue strength. It was observed that microstructure and the size of defects played an important role in early crack growth, and they can reduce the benign effect of a high-strength base material.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • microstructure
  • crack
  • strength
  • fatigue
  • hardness
  • high speed steel