Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Slot, Henk

  • Google
  • 5
  • 10
  • 27

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (5/5 displayed)

  • 2022Uncertainty quantification of the failure assessment diagram for flawed steel components in BS 7910:20195citations
  • 2020Influence of material anisotropy on fatigue crack growth in C–Mn steels of existing structures6citations
  • 2018Use of HSS and VHSS in steel structures in civil and offshore engineering:Requirements regarding material propertiescitations
  • 2018Use of HSS and VHSS in steel structures in civil and offshore engineering:Requirements regarding material properties8citations
  • 2018Use of HSS and VHSS in steel structures in civil and offshore engineering8citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Walters, Carey
1 / 3 shared
Maljaars, Johan
3 / 26 shared
Rózsás, Árpád
1 / 1 shared
Nicoreac, Monica
1 / 1 shared
Es, Sjors Van
2 / 2 shared
Steenbergen, Henri
3 / 3 shared
Pijpers, Richard
3 / 5 shared
Maljaars, J. Johan
1 / 5 shared
Van Es, Sjors
1 / 1 shared
Maljaars, J.
1 / 19 shared
Chart of publication period
2022
2020
2018

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Walters, Carey
  • Maljaars, Johan
  • Rózsás, Árpád
  • Nicoreac, Monica
  • Es, Sjors Van
  • Steenbergen, Henri
  • Pijpers, Richard
  • Maljaars, J. Johan
  • Van Es, Sjors
  • Maljaars, J.
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Uncertainty quantification of the failure assessment diagram for flawed steel components in BS 7910:2019

  • Walters, Carey
  • Maljaars, Johan
  • Rózsás, Árpád
  • Slot, Henk
Abstract

The failure assessment line (FAL) describes the interaction between plastic failure and fracture of flawed steel components subjected to tension or bending. This paper quantifies the model uncertainty of the FAL as provided in the internationally used British Standard BS 7910:2019 by comparing the assessment with the actual failure load of 82 wide plate and 4 tubular joint tests. In line with findings of others, it is demonstrated that the accuracy of the assessment is significantly improved if the crack tip constraint is considered in the assessment. Irrespective of this crack tip constraint consideration, a non-negligible number of wide plate tests has a lower failure load than the one predicted by the FAL in BS 7910:2019, if based on three fracture toughness tests. A penalty or safety margin on the FAL is advocated to compensate for this. It appears advantageous to base the assessment on the average instead of the minimum of three equivalent fracture mechanics tests together with an associated (quantified) safety margin. ; Ship Hydromechanics and Structures

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • crack
  • steel
  • fracture toughness