Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Perez, Pablo Garcia

  • Google
  • 1
  • 5
  • 19

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2019Effect of unstable crack growth on mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of a thermoplastic PEEK composite19citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Dau, Frédéric
1 / 11 shared
Ballère, Ludovic
1 / 3 shared
Bouvet, Christophe
1 / 113 shared
Chettah, Ameur
1 / 8 shared
Peres, Patrick
1 / 2 shared
Chart of publication period
2019

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Dau, Frédéric
  • Ballère, Ludovic
  • Bouvet, Christophe
  • Chettah, Ameur
  • Peres, Patrick
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Effect of unstable crack growth on mode II interlaminar fracture toughness of a thermoplastic PEEK composite

  • Dau, Frédéric
  • Ballère, Ludovic
  • Bouvet, Christophe
  • Perez, Pablo Garcia
  • Chettah, Ameur
  • Peres, Patrick
Abstract

An end notched flexure (ENF) test was used to study the effect of growth stability on mode II interlaminar fracture toughness (GIIC) of a carbon/PEEK composite. The instability of the ENF test was used to induce both stable and unstable crack growth with a static loading. Two techniques were used to evaluate mode II fracture toughness: the traditional compliance method and the infra-red thermography technique. The compliance technique has the advantage of being simple and it has already been confirmed for standard tests. Nevertheless its results may be inaccurate for unstable crack growth propagation. The infra-red thermography technique enables fracture toughness to be accurately measured for non-standard tests in which the crack growth may be unstable. Both methods are complementary and this study came to the conclusion that GIIC is sensitive to crack growth velocity. Fracture toughness showed a low value for crack growth start and unstable propagation, and a high value for stable crack growth. The transition between a ductile fracture mode (for low crack growth velocity) and a brittle fracture mode (for high crack growth velocity) explained the important variability in GIIC values.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • Carbon
  • crack
  • composite
  • thermoplastic
  • fracture toughness
  • thermography