Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Ainsworth, Robert

  • Google
  • 9
  • 29
  • 104

University of Manchester

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (9/9 displayed)

  • 2019A numerical model to simulate ductile tearing-creep crack growth interaction2citations
  • 2018The creep clauses of BS79101citations
  • 2018Factors Affecting the Oxidation and Carburisation Behaviour of an Austenitic Stainless Steel Used in the UK Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactors1citations
  • 2017A transferability approach for reducing excessive conservatism in fracture assessments11citations
  • 2017Residual stress measurement round robin on an electron beam welded joint between austenitic stainless steel 316L(N) and ferritic steel P9152citations
  • 2016Fatigue Life Estimation of Pitted Specimens by Means of an Integrated Fracture Mechanics Approach11citations
  • 2016Design and Assessment for Creep-Fatigue and Creep-Fatigue Crack Growthcitations
  • 2016Application of failure assessment diagram methods to cracked straight pipes and elbows11citations
  • 2016Blunt defect assessment in the framework of the failure assessment diagram15citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nikon, Kamran
1 / 1 shared
Oh, Y-R
1 / 1 shared
Kim, Y-J
1 / 1 shared
Kim, S-J
1 / 2 shared
Palkó, S.
1 / 1 shared
Scenini, Fabio
1 / 108 shared
Larrosa, Nicolas O.
1 / 21 shared
Dey, H. C.
1 / 3 shared
Hosseinzadeh, F.
1 / 6 shared
Smith, Michael
1 / 29 shared
Naveed, N.
1 / 2 shared
Smith, D. J.
1 / 26 shared
Mahadevan, S.
1 / 2 shared
Truman, C. E.
1 / 15 shared
Francis, John
1 / 20 shared
Venkata, K. Abburi
1 / 3 shared
Bhaduri, A. K.
1 / 6 shared
Bouchard, P. J.
1 / 21 shared
Forsey, A. N.
1 / 3 shared
Gungor, S.
1 / 6 shared
Javadi, Yashar
1 / 31 shared
Chapetti, Mirco
1 / 4 shared
Larrosa, Nicolas
2 / 2 shared
Dutta, Bk
1 / 1 shared
Chattopadhyay, J.
1 / 3 shared
Gintalas, Marius
1 / 5 shared
Sahu, Mk
1 / 1 shared
Kima, Yun-Jae
1 / 1 shared
Han, Jae-Jun
1 / 1 shared
Chart of publication period
2019
2018
2017
2016

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nikon, Kamran
  • Oh, Y-R
  • Kim, Y-J
  • Kim, S-J
  • Palkó, S.
  • Scenini, Fabio
  • Larrosa, Nicolas O.
  • Dey, H. C.
  • Hosseinzadeh, F.
  • Smith, Michael
  • Naveed, N.
  • Smith, D. J.
  • Mahadevan, S.
  • Truman, C. E.
  • Francis, John
  • Venkata, K. Abburi
  • Bhaduri, A. K.
  • Bouchard, P. J.
  • Forsey, A. N.
  • Gungor, S.
  • Javadi, Yashar
  • Chapetti, Mirco
  • Larrosa, Nicolas
  • Dutta, Bk
  • Chattopadhyay, J.
  • Gintalas, Marius
  • Sahu, Mk
  • Kima, Yun-Jae
  • Han, Jae-Jun
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

A transferability approach for reducing excessive conservatism in fracture assessments

  • Ainsworth, Robert
  • Larrosa, Nicolas O.
Abstract

A source of uncertainty and conservatism in structural integrity assessments is the value of fracture toughness (Kmat) that is used. For conservative results, the value of Kmat is commonly derived from deeply cracked specimens, such as standard compact tension specimens, C(T). High constraint conditions near the crack tip are ensured and this corresponds to lower-bound toughness values independent of specimen size and geometry. However, the local stress fields in single edge notched tension, SE(T), specimens and pipes, for example, are known to be less severe than those at the tip of a deep sharp crack, resulting in an increased capacity to sustain load and higher toughness. Similar behaviour is expected when assessing non-sharp defects (e.g., pits, gouges, dents). The constraint loss or the notch effect produce a relaxation in the triaxial stress field in comparison to the severe stress fields present at deeply sharp cracked specimens. A methodology providing a simple procedure to evaluate the suitability of the use of a higher fracture toughness to reduce excessive conservatism is then required. This study uses a two-parameter fracture mechanics approach (J-Q) to quantify the level of constraint in a component (e.g. a pipe with a surface crack) and in fracture test specimens, i.e. single edge tension [SE(T]), standard compact tension [C(T)] and notched compact tension [C(T)ρ] specimens. The ability of the structure to resist fracture is given by the fracture toughness of the test specimen with a similar J-Q response. Fracture toughness values for different specimens have been obtained from tearing resistance curves (J-R curves) constructed by means of a virtual testing framework. The proposed engineering approach is used as a platform to perform more accurate fracture assessments by the use of a ductile fracture model that informs a classical fracture mechanics approach (J-Q) by incorporating more fundamental understanding of the driving forces and the role of the geometry and loading conditions.

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • surface
  • laser emission spectroscopy
  • crack
  • fracture toughness