Materials Map

Discover the materials research landscape. Find experts, partners, networks.

  • About
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal Notice
  • Contact

The Materials Map is an open tool for improving networking and interdisciplinary exchange within materials research. It enables cross-database search for cooperation and network partners and discovering of the research landscape.

The dashboard provides detailed information about the selected scientist, e.g. publications. The dashboard can be filtered and shows the relationship to co-authors in different diagrams. In addition, a link is provided to find contact information.

×

Materials Map under construction

The Materials Map is still under development. In its current state, it is only based on one single data source and, thus, incomplete and contains duplicates. We are working on incorporating new open data sources like ORCID to improve the quality and the timeliness of our data. We will update Materials Map as soon as possible and kindly ask for your patience.

To Graph

1.080 Topics available

To Map

977 Locations available

693.932 PEOPLE
693.932 People People

693.932 People

Show results for 693.932 people that are selected by your search filters.

←

Page 1 of 27758

→
←

Page 1 of 0

→
PeopleLocationsStatistics
Naji, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 3
  • 2025
Motta, Antonella
  • 8
  • 52
  • 159
  • 2025
Aletan, Dirar
  • 1
  • 1
  • 0
  • 2025
Mohamed, Tarek
  • 1
  • 7
  • 2
  • 2025
Ertürk, Emre
  • 2
  • 3
  • 0
  • 2025
Taccardi, Nicola
  • 9
  • 81
  • 75
  • 2025
Kononenko, Denys
  • 1
  • 8
  • 2
  • 2025
Petrov, R. H.Madrid
  • 46
  • 125
  • 1k
  • 2025
Alshaaer, MazenBrussels
  • 17
  • 31
  • 172
  • 2025
Bih, L.
  • 15
  • 44
  • 145
  • 2025
Casati, R.
  • 31
  • 86
  • 661
  • 2025
Muller, Hermance
  • 1
  • 11
  • 0
  • 2025
Kočí, JanPrague
  • 28
  • 34
  • 209
  • 2025
Šuljagić, Marija
  • 10
  • 33
  • 43
  • 2025
Kalteremidou, Kalliopi-ArtemiBrussels
  • 14
  • 22
  • 158
  • 2025
Azam, Siraj
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2025
Ospanova, Alyiya
  • 1
  • 6
  • 0
  • 2025
Blanpain, Bart
  • 568
  • 653
  • 13k
  • 2025
Ali, M. A.
  • 7
  • 75
  • 187
  • 2025
Popa, V.
  • 5
  • 12
  • 45
  • 2025
Rančić, M.
  • 2
  • 13
  • 0
  • 2025
Ollier, Nadège
  • 28
  • 75
  • 239
  • 2025
Azevedo, Nuno Monteiro
  • 4
  • 8
  • 25
  • 2025
Landes, Michael
  • 1
  • 9
  • 2
  • 2025
Rignanese, Gian-Marco
  • 15
  • 98
  • 805
  • 2025

Biglari, Farid

  • Google
  • 1
  • 4
  • 13

in Cooperation with on an Cooperation-Score of 37%

Topics

Publications (1/1 displayed)

  • 2014Evaluation of fracture mechanics parameters for a range of weldment geometries with different mismatch ratios13citations

Places of action

Chart of shared publication
Nikbin, Kamran M.
1 / 5 shared
Davies, Catrin M.
1 / 11 shared
Zhou, Haoliang
1 / 5 shared
Mehmanparast, Ali
1 / 79 shared
Chart of publication period
2014

Co-Authors (by relevance)

  • Nikbin, Kamran M.
  • Davies, Catrin M.
  • Zhou, Haoliang
  • Mehmanparast, Ali
OrganizationsLocationPeople

article

Evaluation of fracture mechanics parameters for a range of weldment geometries with different mismatch ratios

  • Nikbin, Kamran M.
  • Davies, Catrin M.
  • Biglari, Farid
  • Zhou, Haoliang
  • Mehmanparast, Ali
Abstract

<p>The elastic-plastic fracture mechanics J-integral parameter and its analogous creep fracture mechanics parameter C<sup>*</sup>, are widely employed to characterise the material's fracture and crack growth behaviour over a range of temperatures and loading configurations. Experimentally the non-linear component of the J-integral and C<sup>*</sup> parameter are evaluated using the geometry dependent fracture mechanics parameter the η factor. For weldments, the η factor is dependent on the relative size and yield strength properties of the base (parent) and weld materials and their mismatch ratio. In this work, the η factor has been evaluated for six fracture geometries using non-linear finite element method for a power law hardening material, and the results have been compared with literature where available. The obtained results, which fall within the best upper/lower bounds, are tabulated for each geometry and the recommended η for a range of mismatch factors are given as a function of the normalised crack length.</p>

Topics
  • impedance spectroscopy
  • polymer
  • crack
  • strength
  • yield strength
  • creep